power is included. there is such a body of law that has grown up about conflict of interest, i don t think that supreme court would apply that to a case where a person was so blantantly misusing the pardon power. under article 3, seconds 3 of the u.s. constitution, the president has to abide by and execute faithfully, the laws of the united states. that doesn t mean he can go out there and use them for his own purposes to evade the law and put himself above the law. i think that there would be a strong argument any that such pardon would not be enforceable. we have never had this happen before. we never tested all of that would hold up, the donald trump names the person who gives them a 5-4 majority.
has grown up about conflict overinterest thatovef interest, i don t think the supreme court would provide that. are you saying that donald trump could be presented by a court from pardoning jared kushner or his son? sure, article three, section three, the president has to abide by and execute faithfully the laws of the united states. that doesn t mean he can go out there and use them for his own purposes to evade the law and to put himself above the law. and i think there would be a strong argument that any such parten would not be enforceable. we never had this happen before. and we never tested whether or not that would hold up in front of the supreme court, which donald trump named the person that gives republicans the 5-4 majority. don t forget the supreme court and nixon was 9-0 forcing him to turnover the tapes. the plot thickens. special watergate prosecutor,
supreme court wouldn t apply that to a case where someone is so blatantly misusing the wait a minute. are you saying that donald trump could be prevented by a court from pardoning jared kushner or his son? sure, article three, section three, the president has to abide by and execute faithfully the laws of the united states. that doesn t mean he can go out there and use them for his own purposes to evade the law and to put himself above the law. and i think there would be a strong argument that any such pardon would not be enforceable. we never had this happen before. and we never tested whether or not that would hold up in front of the supreme court, which donald trump named the person that gives republicans the 5-4 majority. don t forget the supreme court in nixon was 9-0 forcing
legislation and not principles. but we re talking about operational control of the border and border security. and again as republicans an democrats will acknowledge the problems with the visa lottery and the family migration so those four principles are fine, but again it comes down to legislation. there will be bills on floor of the senate and hopefully the house and that is what we need to hear from the white house on. what specific legislation are they willing to support. we can talk principles until we are blue in the face but we don t vote on the principles. there are a lot of folks in the republican party in the house who are not going to move forward with this unless they get urged by the president. there are folks that have no desire to do this. so how do you, a moderate and to your fellow moderates in the house, democrats and republicans, find a way to force the issue if a majority doesn t have the appetite for it and paul ryan is getting pressure from some someone someon
taking care of business. you re searching for something. whoooo. like the perfect deal. .on the perfect hotel. so wouldn t it be perfect if. ..there was a single site. .where you could find the. .right hotel for you at the best price? there is. because tripadvisor now compares. .prices from over 200 kin zinger.