Was in this form and with the board of supervisors, everybody was aware of this issue. Was there conversation at the commission . I mean, im not trying to dredge up and go back on something in 2017, but i need richer context. I didnt find that in the staff report and i actually, on a side note, just think when issues come up to possibly flag them earlier on in the report, also, would be helpful, because im concerned that my concern is that we are setting a precedent that sends a signal to the companies that if they have subsidiaries in other parts of the country, that we will turn a blind eye to the right essence of why San Francisco does this. If were going to ignore these provisions, whether its access to rights or issues, louisiana is on that list and im concerned that were set ag precedent with the commission of close not to engine exceed 6o mn the good news is the board of supervisors will have to make a decision when the contract was originally awarded. They were the preferred co
Disrupt or process at all, coming up with a transition between contract a and b. None of the product is pr pro py tore. We by it and own it and get to use it. Ill just tell you where im at. I was here in 2017 and i owned it then and i will own it now. Once you sign off on something, you dont walk back. We had a discussion in 2017 and this would all come up and laid out. And i supported it then and i support it now. I appreciate what youre saying. Whatever, but we signed off on this as a commission. And everyone commission there, i was here, president brandon, commission kunalokis and commission katz, we had this discussion and it was tough. I cant see this putting this out to bid i mean, we have to own this. We signed off on it. Im going to vote in favour because i agreed to do that. But to stop everything and then you want it back out to bid, i cant support that. We have to live with that and i hope weve learned something from this process. But i tell you where im at and if youre worr
To excuse supervisor rafael mandelman. Madam clerk, do you have any announcements . Clerk yes, please silence all cellphones and electronic devices. Anything to be included as part of the file should be submitted to the clerk. The items today will appear on the next agenda. Commissioner fewer thank you very much. Can you please call item New Brunswick 1. Clerk item no. 1 is the resolution retroactively approving an agreement between the city and county of San Francisco and the San Francisco Bay Area Rapid Transit District bart regarding administration of Capital Funding to fund half of the cost of the bart muni Market Street entrance Modernization Project with proceeds from the sale of general Obligation Bonds, in an amount not to exceed 45,000,000 for an Agreement Term from february 1, 2018, through december 31, 2025. Commissioner fewer thank you very much. Colleagues, last week we heard this item and continued it for more information. We heard from the bla last week. We may not need
Our clerk is ms. Linda wong. Colleagues may i have a motion to excuse supervisor rafael mandelman. Madam clerk, do you have any announcements . Clerk yes, please silence all cellphones and electronic devices. Anything to be included as part of the file should be submitted to the clerk. The items today will appear on the next agenda. Commissioner fewer thank you very much. Can you please call item New Brunswick 1. Clerk item no. 1 is the resolution retroactively approving an agreement between the city and county of San Francisco and the San Francisco Bay Area Rapid Transit District bart regarding administration of Capital Funding to fund half of the cost of the bart muni Market Street entrance Modernization Project with proceeds from the sale of general Obligation Bonds, in an amount not to exceed 45,000,000 for an Agreement Term from february 1, 2018, through december 31, 2025. Commissioner fewer thank you very much. Colleagues, last week we heard this item and continued it for more in
Gouged. 40 of that apartment complex is supposed to be Affordable Housing, and only 2 is accepted to apply at an income of about 45,0 45,000 to 50,00. Youve got inclusionary law where people in the lowincome is supposed to be drunkinclude the housing opportunity, but yet, when you do the documentation, you do not include them. Supervisor walton thank you, mr. Wright. Is there any other Public Comment on item number seven . Seeing none, Public Comment is closed. Supervisor mar, did you have any questions or statements . Thank you. With that said, i will make a motion to refer to the board of supervisors with positive recommendation. Well take that without objection. At this time, we would like to id like to make a motion to recess until 11 15. Going to give our nominee for item number four an opportunity to get here by 11 15. Supervisor walton back in session. Thank you so much. Mr. Clerk, would you please call item number four. Clerk item number four is the motion approvingrejecting th