black lives matter, i am totally for it, i don t think that police brutality is acceptable or brutality of any kind, actually. but it seems to be the one thing we don t need at this hyper charged divided moment in american history is public figures encouraging more division, encouraging us to think of ourselves as members of a group first instead of americans first. this piece seems like a perfect example of that. here is the second recommendation for making the country better. white people, if you re inheriting property you intend to sell upon acceptance, give it to a black or brown family. you are bound to make that money in some other white privilege way. that is attacking people. right? helping you before that? first, i don t want my words taken out of context. i don t agree with every bullet point of the list that she s drafted. however, i do understand the under lying messages and principles. i think the underlying message or the principles are something
tucker: the core premise of black lives matter, i am totally for it, i don t think that police brutality is acceptable or brutality of any kind, actually. but it seems to be the one thing we don t need at this hyper charged divided moment in american history is public figures encouraging more division, encouraging us to think of ourselves as members of a group first instead of americans first. this piece seems like a perfect example of that. here is the second recommendation for making the country better. white people, if you re inheriting property you intend to sell upon acceptance, give it to a black or brown family. you are bound to make that money in some other white privilege way. that is attacking people. right? helping you before that? first, i don t want my words taken out of context. i don t agree with every bullet point of the list that she s drafted. however, i do understand the under lying messages and principles. i think the underlying message
for one of their hosts to be addressing a rally like this with people and black masks, antifa? let s be clear who antifa is. obviously, they are a group that even nancy pelosi has denounced. laura ingraham on this network has suggested they should be labeled a terror organization. berkeley s mayor has called them a criminal gang. this is not a group that you want any network host within a thousand yards of at a rally addressing. there is a hard and fast rule at every news organization, tucker. that is that hosts cannot, or r journalist, reporters for that matter, cannot attend rallies or speak at rallies that its newsroom may be covering. it s a conflict of interest. it s a whole bowl of wrong andow it s something that cnn needs to address and actually give kamaud bell an ultimatum. you re an activist or a host. it reflects on us and make them look bad. i hope that have that conversation. van jones, a pundit and a host on the network, as well, he spoke at a rally one day afterr donal
publication?hi tucker: no. it s not peer-reviewed. are you sure? tucker: i m positive. the political science review or a journal review or history. tucker: not on the one i have. here s the invitation letter yeah, you are defending so i looked at it this afternoon! tucker: maybe we are looking at something different. i think i was looking at the same thing.rn i m quoting from the invitational letter to this group. fascists have use blatantly racist and ablest messaging and iconography to recruit their ranks and intimidate students. they are allies? who does that mean? it seems to me like they are tarring anybody who voted for trump as a bigot. no. i think what they are trying to
a segment of 2014 numbers that show the 5 million. so there s other segments, the british virgin islands of bermuda, we don t all the amounts on that. they also have ownership in foreign corporations. each corporation that they have ownership in, they don t meet the threshold of ownership reported on the form. a tax form. tucker: it s a little confusing when you look at these numbers, $328 million in net assets. why would the southern poverty law center amassed more than a quarter billion dollars? they make all their money from the hate industry. what they do is, in the 1970s, they served a legitimate purpose. they won a lot of landmark civil lawsuits, for civil rights. flash forward to today, the spring far left. they are known for the hate math, as you know, which contains conservative groups, mainstream conservatives group, along with racists like the kkk. this turned into a windfall for them. their leadership, the top people