Everybody talks, everybody talks. Pete Griff Jenkins, i hope have you enough to say for four hours. Griff i want to talk about the knee on trees. This is the first time i have gotten to do this with rachel. Seriously its like my birthday and christmas all wrapped up into one today. Pete its National Chocolate cake day. Maybe we could get you. Rachel is it really National Chocolate cake day . Pete i looked it up. What is today january 27th. National chocolate cake day. Pete. Griff im excited to be here because it has been the most unbelievable news week with the president in davos. The ceos over there giving him ample praise i would say pretty much a heap load of praise. Pete almost universal. Griff as well as i cover politics every day that is the plan the white house has put forward on immigration. Pete have you the Text Messages you are right we are going over immigration as well. So much we can barely keep track of it all. Griff we are going to talk about it. It is certainly one tha
January 6th, 2021, The Insurrection - Part One
kpfa.org - get the latest breaking news, showbiz & celebrity photos, sport news & rumours, viral videos and top stories from kpfa.org Daily Mail and Mail on Sunday newspapers.
We Crossed Many Lines
chronicle.com - get the latest breaking news, showbiz & celebrity photos, sport news & rumours, viral videos and top stories from chronicle.com Daily Mail and Mail on Sunday newspapers.
Atlas, Ferguson, and Hanson: On Free Speech at Stanford
What is the purpose of academic freedom?
Is it to allow all kinds of ideas to be expressed and explored, protecting even speech that people in the past considered hereticalâprotecting free expression that some people today would like to âcancelâ? Or is it to allow co-workers in the ideological minority to be personally and selectively disparaged with impunity?
The answer for some faculty at Stanford University would appear to be the latter.
In a recent meeting of the Stanford Faculty Senate, four professors (Joshua Landy, Stephen Monismith, David Palumbo-Liu and David Spiegel) presented and then subsequently published a farrago of falsehoods directed against various fellows of the Hoover Institution. Their complaint was, first, that the Hoover fellowsâ views were unapologetically conservative and, second, that they appeared antithetical to the majority of those of the Stanford communityâand were ther