witnesses who said they were pressured by people close to the ex-president to, quote, do the right thing, be loyal to donald trump, reminding them trump would be paying close to attention to their words. the committee suggests it has many other examples of witness tampering, which is of course a very serious crime. is that what is happening here? and will the doj be looking into this? they believe they could affect testimony of witnesses before the committee. oits a very serious issue, and i imagine the department of justice would be very interested in and take that seriously as well. the two investigations going on, congressional and criminal, are showing signs of clashing again. there s friction over access to transcripts of interviews the committee conducted that the justice department wants. the new york times reporting federal prosecutors were just as surprised by hutchinson s testimony this week as anyone else watching and left feeling blindsided. but at the same
crime? according to three cnn sources t former aide to then white house chief of staff mark meadows told the panel she was contacted by someone in the trump camp attempting to influence her testimony. remember those messages vice chair liz cheney read aloud at tuesday s hearing alluding to possible witness intimidation. the gop congresswoman didn t name names but she relayed accounts of two unidentified witnesses who said they were pressured by people close to the ex-president to, quote, do the right thing, be loyal to donald trump, reminding them trump would be paying close to attention to their words. the committee suggests it has many other examples of witness tampering, which is of course a very serious crime. is that what is happening here? and will the doj be looking into this? they believe they could affect testimony of witnesses before the committee. oits a very serious issue, and i imagine the department of justice would be very interested in and take that seriousl
that it was real that it actually read mrs. roy brandt on it. though she was never arrested or tried n 2007 after the till case was reopened, bryant s case was brought in front of a grand jury. did not indict her. a majority white grand jury convened and declined to indict carolyn bryant dunham. what do you make of that? we re not sure why they declined to indict her because there was enough evidence there to indict her. the investigation had been done. the watts say their whole lives they have lived with maimmy till moegly s haunting ties for justice and the images that horrified the nation of their cousin lying disfigured in an open casket. it was a scene his mother insisted showing the world to expose what racist hate truly looks like. we did take the torch from maimmy. we ensured to her that we will continue the fight before she passed away. and so for me, i definitely want to see it through. but it has been a tremendous amount of trauma. i still feel like the weight is
shock, speechless in some instances. wow, the moment was very, very, very overwhelming. i had to look at the warrant several times just to make sure that it was real that it actually read mrs. roy brandt on it. though she was never arrested or tried n 2007 after the till case was reopened, bryant s case was brought in front of a grand jury. a majority white grand jury convened and declined to indict carolyn bryant dunham. what do you make of that? we re not sure why they declined to indict her because there was enough evidence there to indict her. the investigation had been done. the watts say their whole lives they have lived with maimmy till moegly s haunting ties for justice and the images that horrified the nation of their cousin lying disfigured in