The area that at t was prototyping the box was a landscape area and we must recognition under the streets better plan theres the citys policy to improve the public rightofway for beautification that the part of the Stormwater Management plan were moving so the rain will run into the dirt and it will be reducing the amount of run off into the storm drain they dont want to repave over a landscape area look taylors theres two specific policies that determines its not appropriate for you to put the box and foundation and pave over an area thats landscaped it doesnt makes sense to the city thats why it was rejected. Im here to answer any questions you have so every homeowner puts landscaping in front of their homes and never mind. laughter . Is there any Public Comment on item 16, please step forward. Hi im rose im the resident on the fell street and the proposed s m f was supposed to go outside of the side of my house theres landscaping and a trees in the area and on the box walk it became
Notification. One thing that at t did not point out is the workflow its identified in g all the Surface Facilities order whereas part of the process we reviewed the application we have a hearing its clearly stated location approved and if so it not if its approved we can moved to for the application for applees evaluation project but if its not approved their supposed to start over you identify a new location and process according. At t is suggesting that instead of having this logical box you approve the box based on the request or disparagraph that theyre saying we ignore this aspect of the workflow whether think an original location or alternative location thats two or three blocks away. The 3 had the foot radius and places the department in a situation where we couldnt get the necessary feedback from another group of folks who may be impacted. Going to the comment recommended to the timing were not following the 60 day requirement as requested. Their referencing the puc code we mus
Toil next is 752 aaron District Attorney street and the next is balboa street and as an carlos street and item next is 121 as an carlos street and the next is 305 elsie street and the next is 415 germany rad street well start with at t. Mr. Johnson you have 5 minutes to present your case so the fact patterns for those eight or nine appeals im going to talk about ralph street. So in this particular application was submitted in may 2013 there wasnt another hearing for 8 most in january 2014. At the hearing lynn fong adhered and said at t applications was in corners with the public works code. At the hearing it was discussed and the hearing officer was told during a box walk an additional location had been identified in addition to the alternative location was on howard street. No members of the community appeared at the hearing to protest. The hearing officer recommended denying this permit application essentially on the basis that an alternative location has been identified as potential
Holder i dont see why the Entertainment Commission would deny it i agree with the Vice President as well as commissioner fung once the permit is issued the permit holder will be more responsible for the neighborhood compliance so i building that the e. C. Anchored correctly in this permit and i move to deny the appeal and move on the basis that the Entertainment Commission did not error. Okay. Thats code compliant. Yes. And great so we have a motion from commissioner fung to deny the appeal on the basis the Entertainment Commission did not error in issuing the code consistent. 19. Commissioner honda. And commissioner fung is absent so that motion passed 4 to zero. Thank you. Okay with the president s content were going to hear the 21 appeals that make up the rest of the calenders as follows the parties will first be provided time to present the board that argument that are for the 21 appeals and rubltd and the board will see what appeals are the patterns and time of the appeals will be
Groups one and 2 apply for group 3 as well i hope your ventsdz result in the same outcome of your decision and id appreciate that greatly. Just other points to clarify who we had our meeting we made it clear that most of the a team that submitted that protest work thats upper available for that the day they scheduled it for 11 00 oclock a week day theres no attempt to get the real input. Clearly as the gentleman from glen park the protest that were invited it seems straightforward you could send out an easy document are you available weekends theres never a perfect time but there are ways to do this this shouldnt be the ability of at t. Those are some of the concerns just specific my experience are the walk i got to the 11 oclock meeting probably 1110 or 1115 i didnt see anybody there thought they were running late and when i decided i missed that i called the number that set up the appointment and email i was told i missed that the community turned out and they found angle alternative