<p><span>The Canadian Securities Administrators (CSA) today announced the proposed board members of the new self-regulatory organization (SRO) and investor protection fund (IPF), and the publication for comment of several documents necessary to launch the new SRO and IPF.</span></p>
Each year, Financial Executives International Canada (FEI Canada) recognizes a member who has made substantial contributions to improving the organization. FEI Canada is thrilled to announce that the 2021 Frank S. Capon Distinguished Service Award winner is Louis Marcotte of the Québec Chapter.
money for the curators? creely testified that even though he previously had resisted giving judge porteous cash, he would now he now would give him cash in response to judge porteous demand because it quote wasn t costing him anything. it did not cost creely anything because the money creely gave judge porteous came from the curatorship fees. amato, who split the payments to judge porteous with creely 50-50 corroborated the events. amato testified that creely informed him quote that the judge was sending curator cases to him and that he would in turn give money to the judge. amato agreed to go along with the arrangement but told creely that it was quote going to turn out bad, which it clearly has. amato testified he knew the curatorship scheme was wrong, but he was not strong enough to say no to what he understood to be a classic kickback arrangement. creely and amato provided judge porteous cash every few months in response to judge porteous requests. th
Transcripts For CSPAN2 U 20101208 archive.org - get the latest breaking news, showbiz & celebrity photos, sport news & rumours, viral videos and top stories from archive.org Daily Mail and Mail on Sunday newspapers.
appeal. most judges won t do that. he didn t say in detail what the relationship was. he understood that mole was going to apeople one thing he did want to correct is that mole said incorrectly that he had received campaign contributions from these individuals and he said that s just not true. and he corrected it on the record. he never denied the relationship. from his perspective having a relationship, a friendship, particularly from his time in get na was not a gretna was not a problem, not a recusable issue and so he left it at that. the third allegation is that judge porteous should be removed from office because he denied lifemark s recusal motion. that is the most dangerous allegation in article i. because that would remove a judge for the substance of his decision, in this case, a recusal motion. can you imagine if you start to remove judges because you disagree with the recusal decisions. judges are constantly appealed on recusal decisions. if you start to remove j