Matters . These are largely housekeeping matters in following up on the changes that the commission has already made. And are pretty straightforward and i think selfexplanatory. There are three decision points. The first is shall the commission approve the addition of section 3d as set forth on page 3 of the enforcement regulations . The second is to approve the deletion of other references to the sunshine ordinance and the enforcement regulations. And the third is to change the definition of business day to comply with the sunshine regulations that we propagated previously. These seem to me to be pretty straightforward administrative changes. Is there any discussion on these . Anything from the City Attorney . Public comment on this item . [tkpwaofrpl ], my name is dr. Derrick kur, my comment is not specific to the sunshine ordinance modifications, but does refer to section 6a of your enforcement guidelines. My recollection is that the ken civil grand jury when they did their report,
Do commissioners have objections to taking Public Comment now. No. It sound like what you are offering to mr. Shaw is something outside of Public Comment and as a party to this proceeding you are giving him five minutes and after mr. Shaws five minutes open up the floor for Public Comment. Okay. We can do that. Thank you, mr. Givner. Im turning into mr. Chatfield my 150word testimony that i will remail so you dont have to rekey it, introducing typos. Im sorry, can you hand me that copy back . Never mind, i found what i was looking for. So you will recall that when i was here, in october, i testified that 1040 doesnt apply and i also testified quite strongly, both here and at the Sunshine Task force that c369913 doesnt apply either. I have been denied access to these records for two years. Regarding access to litigation states, advice and compliance with, analysis of, and opinion concerning liability under or any communication otherwise concerning the California Public records act the r
And or local ordinances that protect the disclosure of this information, including c3. 69913a. Her proposal i believe is to produce the information as redacted. Not having that section at my fingertips, or in mind, and i dont but its hard for me to make a judgment on this without knowing what that privilege knowing more about the nature of that privilege that would require that certain information be redacted. I am going back to her memo as well. This is the longer one. Thanks. Following up on commissioner studleys question, is the privileged standard that were looking at the one were talking about all notes, preliminary reports . Controllers benchmark studies, audits, investigations and other reports shall be confidential . That is that is the first part of it. First part. And the Second Quarter part of the standards is records of any investigation shall be considered confidential information to the extent permitted by state law. Correct. And then there is the evidence code 1040 secti
That is that is the first part of it. First part. And the Second Quarter part of the standards is records of any investigation shall be considered confidential information to the extent permitted by state law. Correct. And then there is the evidence code 1040 section defining official information. Okay. And that portion we dont have in our memo, right . Tonight . Here it is if you want to take a look at it. Okay. mr. Givner, have i missed anything . No, no. I was just searching to see if i had evidence code 1040. I would note that infection f1. 8110b involves whistleblower complaints and the second section you noted c369913 involves ethics investigations. Do commissioners have objections to taking Public Comment now. No. It sound like what you are offering to mr. Shaw is something outside of Public Comment and as a party to this proceeding you are giving him five minutes and after mr. Shaws five minutes open up the floor for Public Comment. Okay. We can do that. Thank you, mr. Givner.
My name is paula danish and i have a serious issue with the San Francisco Arts Commission. I have a street artists permit and i have had a lot of problems and they have violated the sunshine ordinance repeatedly over so many years. And its really affected my life. I have been speaking to your ethics office, about problems posting minutes of the executive committee. They havent posted in years. And i just hope that you really do a thorough investigation on them, because there is a lot of things wrong with the way they run the meetings. Thanks. The next item on the agenda is changes to our enforcement regulations, mr. St. Croix would you like to introduce the matters . These are largely housekeeping matters in following up on the changes that the commission has already made. And are pretty straightforward and i think selfexplanatory. There are three decision points. The first is shall the commission approve the addition of section 3d as set forth on page 3 of the enforcement regulations