that was in my notes. the second one that is also correct. thank you. commissioner moore: could i ask, when you talk about new and modern buildings, what kind of building type are you referring to? i have a hard time believing every residential building would be subject to this requirement? it raises all kinds of issues of public health and accessibility, security, etc. at this point, i just have a short summary, which up provided. it does not give me more detail about the types of buildings. i could give the details to the commission. commissioner moore: ok. the other question is, regarding the housing trust fund. you mentioned the basic principles of. i would be curious what you would encompass in the discussion of balanced growth? is that a more equitable distribution of housing types? that is not my language. that is the language described by the resolution and the ordinances. so, we can we can get you more information on that whole package. as i understand it,
we would want a hearing on both items. commissioner sugaya? commissioner sugaya: i think the report was sufficient for me to understand the cpmc situation. to your knowledge, are there health representatives? to his knowledge. yes, there were. i was just talking about the relationship between cpmc and health? is that the time of our hearing i think i am the one who said all sutter health needs to is drivecpmc down drive cpmc down to 1%. thank you. commissioners, we have a couple of highlights. the architectural review committee went into regular hearings. on a regular calendar, to my understanding, that is the first time that body actually initiated, and it was for a property for 2004, is directly known as the san jordan s bar. they approved be an annoyance for the procedures and fees. we got they approved the amendments for the procedures and fees. they also reviewed the design to alter union square. it is part of the subway. after candid comments, they ult
short summary, which up provided. it does not give me more detail about the types of buildings. i could give the details to the commission. commissioner moore: ok. the other question is, regarding the housing trust fund. you mentioned the basic principles of. i would be curious what you would encompass in the discussion of balanced growth? is that a more equitable distribution of housing types? that is not my language. that is the language described by the resolution and the ordinances. so, we can we can get you more information on that whole package. as i understand it, the ballot measure is what i do not know is i think they re intense was to have it the intent was to have it approved. we would want a hearing on both items. commissioner sugaya? commissioner sugaya: i think the report was sufficient for me to understand the cpmc situation. to your knowledge, are there health representatives? to his knowledge. yes, there were. i was just talking about th
each area. i ll be glad the challenge to answer individual modifications. even though this project, occupies a relatively large lot, the articulate with a series of points with an overall architectural vocabulary, the route this building we enforce the reticulation. the eastern and western parts of the project have an architectural language which is distinct. the smaller scale has a different methodology, reinforcing the fine grain pattern of development. the building relates to the larger scale and forms that there were development area, as it also breaks down the narrow pattern of the other area in the vicinity. and there is a better street plan, within the public realm, including extensions of the southeast corner. the project includes the improvement of hickory street, to the north of the site. this is improved as a shortstop, but it is mostly an improved paper street for the majority of the block. we have a concept drawing for this living st. treatment, including robus