saddam hussein s aggression was right, just and moral. and we did the right thing. it was over in quick order. it was necessary. clearly the united states was the sole power left. brit: the on question was whether united states forces should remove saddam hussein. it was the right thing to do. they didn t know what would happen if saddam was gone. they knew it weren t be a walk in the park. he said he wouldn t do it and he kept his word. people said why didn t you go to baghdad and take care of saddam when you had the chance. people don t ask that question anymore. the ethnic conflicts that would have resulted and have resulted. it was a wise decision.
saddam hussein s aggression was right, just and moral. and we did the right thing. it was over in quick order. it was necessary. clearly the united states was the sole power left. brit: the on question was whether united states forces should remove saddam hussein. it was the right thing to do. they didn t know what would happen if saddam was gone. they knew it weren t be a walk in the park. he said he wouldn t do it and he kept his word. people said why didn t you go to baghdad and take care of saddam when you had the chance. people don t ask that question anymore. the ethnic conflicts that would have resulted and have resulted. it was a wise decision.
saddam hussein s aggression was right, just and moral. and we did the right thing. it was over in quick order. it was necessary. clearly the united states was the sole power left. brit: the on question was whether united states forces should remove saddam hussein. it was the right thing to do. they didn t know what would happen if saddam was gone. they knew it weren t be a walk in the park. he said he wouldn t do it and he kept his word. people said why didn t you go to baghdad and take care of saddam when you had the chance. people don t ask that question anymore. the ethnic conflicts that would have resulted and have resulted. it was a wise decision.
saddam hussein s aggression was right, just and moral. and we did the right thing. it was over in quick order. it was necessary. clearly the united states was the sole power left. brit: the on question was whether united states forces should remove saddam hussein. it was the right thing to do. they didn t know what would happen if saddam was gone. they knew it weren t be a walk in the park. he said he wouldn t do it and he kept his word. people said why didn t you go to baghdad and take care of saddam when you had the chance. people don t ask that question anymore. the ethnic conflicts that would have resulted and have resulted. it was a wise decision.
hours. but about having to have the audacity to say we ll dictate all of the terms, and we re going to cooperate with and he has the ultimate grand jury subpoena power in his back pocket, it is a fantasy to think they could dictate every term but it is part of the rudy to the rescue since he joined the administration. it is not crazy to think there would be a time limit? as i said, with clinton it was four hours. and two or three hours is too short. but it is not that different from four. which is what clinton agreed to. but if you just look at the whole demeanor of how the white house is handling this, the odds that they could actually reach any sort of agreement on time, on subject matter seem increasingly remote. and the way trump dealt with litigation through his business career. it is fight, fight, fight. on question of an interview, laura coats, we know that robert mueller raised the possibility of a subpoena with trump s lawyers if the white house if the president were