country. i know a lot of americans and black alike have been duped. they understand the economy is in the toilett and theice of. experience of it is no different just because they re fed the politics we staf racial division. if we stand up and speak l. uth, we end up winning well, you just got a lot of kudos online from ellen, who seems to be perhaps moving away, maybe from and towardestin you. very quickly, your reaction on that then? f you i have one more question for you. look, i think ellen is an do excellent example of what he did at twitter is a good example of what i want to do to the administrative state. take out 75% of that deadweightt cost, improve the actual experience of what it s supposed to do. and at the same time, i love the wate y he released the twitter files. i ll release the state action filesfiles. any time a bureaucrat has pressured a private company. fors watch it for the for a the world to see. and he put an extra to it. i ll put a big x through
we are out of time, thank you, mike, baker, tim, tyrus. laura: everyone, i m laurat. ingraham, john eastman says hisa client will never plead guilty e in the january 6th case. tonight he is here to tell ushe why. butre first, the realirst election meddlers, that s the focus of tonight s angle. this indictment it is cringy. msel i can t tell you how facially.
do you have any or reason to believe there are programs in advanced tech space that are unsanctioned? yes, i do.ye how does a program like that t funded? i will give you generality, a can get more specific in closed session. p misappropriations of funds. does that mean there is money for a sxrm it goes to something else. yesney,, i have knowledge of that. lauras al: it is fungible an together. laurat : not this white hous. david grush, who sat on panel says he was informed of uap retrieval, based on interviewin 40 witnesses over 40 years. does this program exist and do you believe the american people
publicly against him at trial? well, we all know that not wm lawyer is going to muzzle, president trump and frankly, they shouldn t. this is a politicothey well indictment against him. they are ignoring the presidentialg thpresiden act the biden justice department, they are ignoring the 2012 clinton software case. they are ignorincag the 2019 office of legal counsel. legal opinion thatse you generally obstruct investigations in into i non crimesnvesti. hese know that president trump had the right to these records under the presidential recordsact act. they know that the presidential records act does not have a criminal not component. and for them to charge espionage for foump r trump just simply retaining not even using, not eve nn harming our nation s national security, simply having his presidential l ,which he s allowed to have under the presidential records act, is not goin to stag stand as alaw. matter of law. so i want to ge laurat tha back to your point earlier that you bel
against donald trump. i believe your intention, and il believe it s a politicalie intention to indict president trump became presmp becamr when classified documents were discovered repeatedly atresiden. president biden s multiple residence. those were first discovere d on november 2nd, six days before the prior election. e department of justice was notified on november 4th. and yet miraculouslyth, again ,i no leak about the classifieded documents ate biden president s home when it politicallyt po benefitelitid the effort to go d after and charge donald trump doj leak leaks under all circumstances are inappropriate ,and they were not directed by anyone in the that s called laurat or deny. oh, of course, leaks are inappropriate. always. and they re apparently carried out by a ghost. don t know who did it ever. now, garland certainly didn twok seem worked up about thatbout as the fbi s richmond field office was about catholics