information, corruptly concealing documents nationa, conspiracy to obstruct justice, and alsoracy to 18 u.s.c. 1001e statements. now, let s not pretend here because over the next year, mayb. e more than that, maybeonger, longer, we re going to be seeing a very complicated legal process that will unfold regarding this indictment. ste we re going to cover it every step of the way as it does es unfold. e at dif and i m sure at different points, you re going to see merrick garland, the attorney on the hill, insisting that this prosecutionthe hill all bee by the books without political fear or favor. are going to be filed.motion cross motions are goings to be filed. leaks will happen, but maybe in an unconventional wa hapy. but i want to be veryy clea clear upfront herer . tens of millions of americans believe that donald trump isican being indicted by d fbi because he s a political opponent of the d.c. establishment and joe biden and, of course est he s the most popular rep
on fake and fabricated charges of which he and numerous other presidents would be guilty. right in the middle ofilty. presidential election in whichs he is losinglosi very badly. no other president, even those who kept far more documents that i has ever been even investigated, let alone charget alond with a crime. it s joe biden and his corrupt department of injustice those who think they are above the law, never before have the two standards of justice in our country been more starkly. o and that same type of cheeringhe you just heard at the clubar was also heard organically hours earlier, hundreds of supporters showed up outside the miami courtroom whercoure pre. tha president trump was arraigned and after that, dozens more wens t to a cuban restaurant in the city where they sang happy birthday to former president trump and took selfie after selfie with him. desp now, one thing is clear here. now, despite all the naysayersit ,his support is still very strong and perhaps
a vulnerability. i think their strongest counts arer strot co the obstn counts. and,ra: and, david, media constt during this past few days has been the attacks on judge elaineck cannon, who s presiding over this case as federal district court judge. nocasew continued today. watch this. the judge does not have greattay experience. most judges there and certainly judgdge canne cannon does not he experience. she s proved that certainly with her decisions, earliere rulings after the search at the. she doesn t have experience when actually the case is going to be argument - doesnexperiei and arguably she doesn t evefin understand the different: david, the different levels of security. now, david, i m not surote iu andrea mitchell has actually heard any of the oral arguments at the supreme court, bumeat thet ketanji brown jackss on the court of appeals for whatals for , six months? med i don t i don t recall l about hereing al experience to be a supreme court justice.
37 count indictment very carefully. and, you know, i sum it up in one sentence. i d say there s probably evidence that of things that are alleged in their. but the case should never have been brought forward as a forwn. a case so it s there s it s a case of prosecutorial discretion, the hillary clinton case that went one way and the investigation was conducted inucted differently. nt in this case, it was it wentay another way. and that prosecuto r discretion went towards prosecuting and not only prosecutingecuting loading up 37 counts in an indictment, which one core set of facts. i call it unbundling. you know, one core indictmenth and turning it into a bunch of micro indictments. veryof different treatment herei versus hillary clinton. l, harvard law prof. larry tribe thinks that the president records act might mike cites this a lot won t helpke trump in this case.n this watch this.e. there s no question the presidential n act provides no defense for donald
publicly against him at trial? well, we all know that not wm lawyer is going to muzzle, president trump and frankly, they shouldn t. this is a politicothey well indictment against him. they are ignoring the presidentialg thpresiden act the biden justice department, they are ignoring the 2012 clinton software case. they are ignorincag the 2019 office of legal counsel. legal opinion thatse you generally obstruct investigations in into i non crimesnvesti. hese know that president trump had the right to these records under the presidential recordsact act. they know that the presidential records act does not have a criminal not component. and for them to charge espionage for foump r trump just simply retaining not even using, not eve nn harming our nation s national security, simply having his presidential l ,which he s allowed to have under the presidential records act, is not goin to stag stand as alaw. matter of law. so i want to ge laurat tha back to your point earlier that you bel