jeffrey clark. he, you may remember, is the environmental lawyer that the ex-president allegedly wanted to install as attorney general because, of course, he seemed willing to help trump overturn then-president-elect biden s victory. the footage shows authorities arriving at clark s doorstep two weeks ago and executing a search warrant on his virginia home. as you can see here, he answered the door in boxers and a dress shirt and was asked to wait outside while officers searched the house. the raid was part of the justice department s probe in the effort to overturn the 2020 election. it is not clear whether clark himself is the subject of a criminal investigation. clark, though, did plead the fifth more than 100 times before the january 6th committee. so, there s that. speaking of the january 6th committee, that brings us back to someone else about to sit down with the panel. former white house counsel pat cipollone allegedly threatened to resign in an oval office meeting th
freely. but the people who need voters for power are going to do what it takes to defeat the monster. none of them are willing to do it. you saw scott jennings talking about because republican voters aren t watching this. this is because republican elites aren t giving this committee the power that it needs to have. it s not being covered in conservative media fairly, despite the fact that liz cheney, who s a deep conservative, is the lead prosecutor for it. i m not seeing a lot of evidence that the elites are changing their views, even though we are seeing a little bit of movement among voters, which is encouraging. the liz cheney point is interesting because mulvaney also in our interview trashed liz cheney, quite frankly. right, right. said don t listen to her, but do listen to all of the republicans who are coming forward, people like cassidy hutchinson. so, i guess time will tell. tim miller, thanks very much for your time tonight. i appreciate having you. back to the janu
point? that s a great point. it s similar to what you would refer to as an adverse inference to someone who takes the fifth amendment in a civil case and basically the law is that you could use that assertion of the fifth amendment, you can t use it against them in a criminal case but take an inference against them in a similar case. it s a similar idea in impeachment we said every time you obstruct, you are essentially admitting that you have incup tory evidence and that s exactly what liz cheney is saying. she is saying you cannot assert executive privilege unless you have relevant information to our committee, which is investigating january 6th. so by the fact that you are asserting some executive privilege over documents or testimony it means there is relevant information that you donald trump, the former
and i think one thing that really was truly a step forward was that we had a good discussion about specific proposals the president was looking at and some of the things he thought would help us get to that 218 in the house and 50 in the senate. so this is important. we ve had many conversations up until this point talking about different issues but really, we have to look at what an entire package, what the substance of an entire package would look like and at this point we started having more of that specific conversation, which i think is very important because we all have a huge sense of urgency that we need to get this done right away. you have in the past been supportive of the $3.5 trillion target. you re one of the moderates who is willing to go to that level. but now obviously, it s some kind of scaling back discussion. what are the points that you consider most important to
things went on january 6th and he said oh, yes, the public will be shocked. we have found stuff that will surprise you and then for liz cheney to have said that tonight, i feel like they re starting to give indications where the investigation is going. i hope we can find more about the cooperation they already had. the chairman mentioned that in his statement in the committee tonight about how bannon is the only one so okay, what does that mean what is mark meadows doing exactly if bannon is the only one resisting in the way he is resisting and we have pete aguilar, a member of the committee joining us for that discussion. that s one of the things we ll see what they can and can t tell us about that. because obviously, they are trying to contain how much of the information gets out at this point. yes. and rightfully so. they will present findings.