Presentation and then get back to it. Let me continue to address other primary concerns brought up today. We want to be clear the current design of the proposed project does not include a basement level for the proposed building. The geotechnical report and supplement analysis may reflect iterations of the proposed project including a basement level. This could be confusing as no longer considerations no longer apply as the building will be built at grade. In described in the cpe its only excavating about four feet below Ground Surface. The geotechnical investigation found ground water at 11 to 12 feet below the Ground Surface and recommended a designed level of eight feet below Ground Surface that means assuming ground water is found at eight feet below Ground Surface. The project is only excavating four feet below the Ground Surface. Though the project may encounter ground water during construction for soil improvements its unlikely the finished grade will extend into ground water th
Not a signed Lease Agreement. But it is something that you guys are working on it and it is doable and very intend to pursue it. I dont think we will have any time of any kind of Lease Agreement any time soon, but we do have the specs, which was a wish list for what they want. Within priced it out, we have a study, and the next section will be engagement with a catchment designer and going over the next level of detail. I dont know in terms of timing. We are planning on pursuing that next step. Again, i think that in between what you described, there is a spectrum of possibilities. They have been around and been doing this for a long time. They have done tenant improvements and build outs and other places. They do know both what is doable and what their funding is and what they can take on. Commissioner richards . I guess, i looked on the last couple pages of the revised motion. A talked about what was actually going to be given because of the state density bonus, but it does not quote
Guys are working on it and it is doable and very intend to pursue it. I dont think we will have any time of any kind of Lease Agreement any time soon, but we do have the specs, which was a wish list for what they want. Within priced it out, we have a study, and the next section will be engagement with a catchment designer and going over the next level of detail. I dont know in terms of timing. We are planning on pursuing that next step. Again, i think that in between what you described, there is a spectrum of possibilities. They have been around and been doing this for a long time. They have done tenant improvements and build outs and other places. They do know both what is doable and what their funding is and what they can take on. Commissioner richards . I guess, i looked on the last couple pages of the revised motion. A talked about what was actually going to be given because of the state density bonus, but it does not quote the hardship or the financials. I look look at office spac
against. that concludes today s hearing. thank you, everyone. we will adjourn in honor of the victims of the buffalo and the uvalde massacre. thank you. good afternoon and welcome stot san francisco historic preservation commission hearing for june 1, 2022. in person and remote hybrid hearings require everyone s attention and most of all our patience. if you are joining remote low and not speaking mute your microphone. broadcasting and strolling this live and we ll receive comment for each item today. comments are opportunity to speak during the public comment period available by calling 415-sick 55-0001. we will take comment from persons in the chamber first and open up remote line. speak clearly approximate slowly. state your name for the record. each will be allowed up to 3 minutes and when you are 30 seconds you will hear a chime indicating your time is almost up. il announce your time is up and take the next person. for those call nothing to submit testimony when w
item 2, case 2014, 0243, 3927 through 3931 19th street. indefinite continuance. under the regular calendar, staff is requesting that item 17 for case number 2015, 00419, 333 12th street, conditional use authorization, to be continued to february 13, 2020. no other items for continuance and no speaker cards. president koppel: any members of the public that would like to comment on the items proposed for continuance? come on up am come on up. hi, my name is tracy thompson. am i to understand we can comment on number one in the regular calendar right now? only to the matter of continuance, not the project itself. so i m confused. well, item 1 no, item 1, under the regular calendar. no we re just taking matters proposed for continuance. when do we speak for when that item is called. thanks, sorry. president koppel: any other members of the public wish to comment on items proposed for continuance, come on up. hello, i want to confirm there is 333 12th