law for lgbt individuals. and for the city it was a very simple matter. this is discrimination based on the status of these couples. what the charities were arguing is that the city can still accomplish its anti-discrimination goals. there are other available adoption groups and organizations and that they don t have to force religiously-based organizations to adhere to this policy when it would essentially counter mand. as they conflict with religious and free speech rights. the court is beginning to bring a degree of clarity here. what you see on the justices is a recognition we ll need a more bright line rule so that people know where they are protected in terms of not just freedom of
Сменет генерал Арсовски, НА НЕГОВО МЕСТО - генерал БЕСНИК ЕМИНИ
vecer.mk - get the latest breaking news, showbiz & celebrity photos, sport news & rumours, viral videos and top stories from vecer.mk Daily Mail and Mail on Sunday newspapers.
was bad, meaning he should determine if it is bad or not, and really it is a bright line rule and congress should pass a law that would mandate they disclose any contacts. that would take the discretion out of it. but this is very much in line with his view of law enforcement. he thinks he knows better than law enforcement and that tends to make a very lawless administration. what is interesting, you bring up what congress should do here but the majority leader mitch mcconnell shown unwillingness to take up any bills addressing election interference, according to reporting from manu raju and our hill team, on top of that he was asked about the president s comments and he said he sort of pivoted to democrats and said this is the democrats picking on him. what is going on with mitch mcconnell? what is his strategy here? yeah, i mean, obviously mcconnell is trying to tamp down a controversy, the president clearly expects his lawmakers on the hill to do that. but the reality is repub