nuclear option, if the filibuster isn t there. this could be the outcome it s flat wrong well, this is what we re going to discuss right now. so do the democrats think this through? this may be the potential reality. you may disagree as to whether or not it s viable. no, no, no. when he talks about the nuclear option, it was solely about executive appointees and judges however, bob, today at the podium when the white house was asked, would you, then would you not allow this rule to go towards legislation? and they would not rule it out. it s not why would anybody believe what the white house has to say? they ve flip-flopped on every issue on principle. the white house wouldn t go along with it. the point is it might not be specifically tailored. no, it doesn t apply bob, we re talking about this. i m saying what could happen. it is not for sure a bright line rule, so that is something you have to look at as a potential outcome. i don t think it s even in t
different scrutiny applies here and other areas. strict scrutiny is a very difficult standard for any government group, any government to meet. and here the state of texas had a system of taking the top 10% of student and that diddy d. bring a degree of diversity. and it will be very difficult for them to say in addition to that, we need to give race this type of weight. so what you have then is a decision that will make it tougher to use race as a criteria. but a decision that doesn t rule out the use of race. the court in fact embraces the race factor in achieving diversity. so in that sense i think universities can take from this one hopeful note that the court did not say we re going to create a bright line rule. since 1978, we ve been trying to go deal with race. we keep on getting these cases every five or so years. no more consideration of race. they didn t say didn t do that. you can still use race as a
spending in election spending to the fec while complaining to be c-4 social welfare groups. there is a lot to solve but i think a bright line rule would really do that as well as actually comprehensive disclosure legislation because that would disincentive advise people from people abusing these vehicles of dark money. i m trying to picture congress now won t pass anything. suddenly the republican house passing something that empowers the i did see it. i have to thank i have to thai liz kennedy from the progressive think tank and marc elias with perkins coie. kim barker with propublica. with the new staples rewards program you get 5% back, on everything. everything. everything. everything. everything. everything. everything? [ all ] everything? yup! with the new staples rewards program
through. he s talking about the nuclear option. this could be the outcome it s flat wrong well, this is what we re going to discuss right now. so do the democrats think this through? you may disagree as to whether or not it s viable. when he talks about the nuclear option, it was solely about executive appointees and judges however, bob, today at the podium when the white house was asked would you then would you not allow this rule to go towards legislation, and they would not rule it out. it s not why would anybody believe what the white house has to say? they ve flip-flopped on every issue on principle. the point is it might not be specifically tailored. no, it doesn t apply bob, we re talking about this. i m saying what could happen. it s not for sure a bright line rule so that is something you have to look at as a potential outcome. i don t think it s even in