can do a standing back flip. let us know when we are thank you. jason. chair gee we are good to go. you are muted, chair gee 2 years. good morning. i d like to call the board of director s meeting of may 12, 22 to order. i m gee gee the chair. this board meeting is being conducted pursuant to provisions of the upon brown act and compliance with the california bill ab361, to facilitate teleconference to reduce the risk of covid-19 upon transmission at meetings. the brown act sets rowels for teleconferencing. ab361 has suspended the rowels this is during the state of emergency and state and local officials recommended to promote social distancing. as noted on the agenda members may bench this teleconference meeting via sfgov.org and call the public comment number. i like to welcome the members of public and staff watching live on sfgov.org and thank the staff for their support and services. could you call the roll. thank you. prior to calling roll dave is sitting in eltawan
Screen. So theres the drawing you see the penthouse was moved further east now and so it actually, the door lines up with the west side of the roof deck im asking for is consistent with what youre proposing with 3 modifications because the four feet four feet reduces the roof deck by thirty or 33 percent 3 feet on the west, 3 feet on the north and 4 by 4 foot section at the door to allow someone to leave the penthouse and assess the deck. If you would draw it please i cant see that to comment. She wants a setback on the west side exactly. Along with the chimney yes. I drew it wrong 3 feet on the north side. What is the reason for 3 instead of 4. Just because it reduced the rjd by 35 percent a big reduction so i prefer it to be 25 percent that is what im proposing instead of the 3 feet if the offset the fire code is a nice number for the setback. Im comfortable with that. As a seconder ill agree the setback will be 3 feet from the north and west sides if im correct. Thats correct i thou
Correct. Thats correct i thought you were worried about the odds my reference to the arrow shown the drawing. Okay commissioner Vice President richards and i guess mr. Lindsey want to make sure have you looked at the calculations the reason im asking weve done an audience audit inform september but permanent a training issue and 2 of 5 fails the audit there was indeed an audit i want to make sure your comfortable with those calculations. Commissioners i did not personally review those. As motion id like to ask mr. Lindsey to double check the calculations to make sure it is not a demo. Ill accept that as part of motion. Thats fine it looks okay to me. Call the question. Commissioners, if theres nothing further theres there is a motion that has been seconded to take dr and approve the project as proposed with the modifications to the roof deck only and the railing associated with the roof deck to set it back from the edge of the building 3 feet own the west and north side and for staff t
Commission im Marshall Schneider an architect working with the neighbors with the project proposed the neighbors of the proposed project building there are several reasons that warrant commission bans the commissioners, on that motion related to the design decisions lets examine the size the average size on or of the buildings the same zoning is 2 thousand plus square feet open an average lot size and the largest this on the block is currently 3 thousand plus and the lot size of 3 thousand square feet the proposed project is 5 thousand plus the promoted project is one. 5 the size of largest structure on the block and that is more than double the size of average structure per Historical Planning Commission is not grounds for the exceptional or extraordinary circumstances we believe the sheer size the project coupled with the design that the project sponsor neatest the exceptional or extraordinary the first, the decision the project sponsor made to leave the exit facade massing and this
Is meeting held during a proclaimed state of emergency and officials recommended measures to promote social distancing. As noted on the agenda, members of the public may observe this teleconchs meeting via sfgovtv and offer comment by calling the Public Comment phone number. I like to welcome the members of the public and staff for watching live on sfgovtv and i like to thank the sfgovtv staff for their support and their services. Madam secretary. Call the roll. Thank you. Chair gee. I note we have morgan sitting in as lipkins ash sense. With that director galley . Present. Drushth john baptiste. Present. Director shaw. Present. Tumlin. Present. Vice chair mandelman is expected im guessing he is delayed and chair gee. Present. Directors you have a quorum. Call your next item thank you. Directors item 3 is communications we like to remiemdz the public as the Public Comment froesz is on the agenda and streaming on the screen. Also we will resume in person meeting at city hall in hearing