was a hoax, two impeachments were a hoax, the mueller investigation was a hoax and much more. same sleazy people involved. and in the days after, trump kept bringing up that washington post report again and again and again. on august 26th, affidavit heavily redacted. nothing mentioned on nuclear. a few days later, again, quote, what happened to nuclear, a word that was leaked early on by fbi doj to the fake news media? something about that whole nuclear thing really irked donald trump. it really got right under his skin. but besides trump s littleout burst for days after that reporting we heard nothing about the washington post s reporting on those nuclear secrets, no other news outlets confirm the post s along-terming reporting. but then a week ago, a week ago tonight, the justice department revealed in a court filing in an unsealed subpoena from may for those documents that the doj was looking for documents at mar-a-lago, ones that including classification called formally
never tried a case before donald trump gave her a life time appointment to the united states district court for the middle district of florida. she was the one who handed down the opinion abruptly ending the federal mask mandate on u.s. airlines. or there is 39 judge justin walker who had also never tried a case in his life when president trump appointed him to the federal bench in 2019. in 2020, judge walker ruled in favor of a louisville wedding photographer who wanted to deny service to same sex couples. that decision was appealed but just last week another judge once again sided with the photographer and this time the judge was a guy named benjamin beaton, 40-year-old judge, another appointee of, wait for it, donald trump. as much as legal experts would like to believe that cases like this are decided on the merits of the argument made in court, the rulings of judges like aileen cannon and katherine mizelle and justin walker, they
is an embarrassment that senators do not reveal what kind of jut a nominee would make by disclosing her views on important legal issues. the president has his vetting process. we in the senate have our vetting process. this is the only opportunity for the american public to learn who you are. they deserve to learn about your views and motivations before you don the black robes of a justice for a life time appointment. for each supreme court nomination i have participated i put each nominee to a test of judicial excellence. your nominee will be no different. a nominee must demonstrate she has the competence, character and temperment and have an open mind not only hear cases with an open mind but decide cases with
life time appointment on the u.s. supreme court? well, she s absolutely ready. i mean, and she s relatively young by supreme court standards. 50 years old is practically jailbait on the supreme court. the question is she the right person. what do you think? i don t understand how well, i don t know because she is such a mystery. but i was hoping that since the democrats won two elections in a row rather handily they would say to themselves, you know, we need to put one of our people on the court, a liberal. the republicans have no trouble doing that with conservatives. i mean, they didn t put a question mark on the court. they put people like john roberts and alito. these are bona fide, dyed in the wool extremely conservative people and everybody knew it. why can t the democrats do the same thing? i don t know if americans realize how right wing this court is and this woman, nobody