As the case was heard at London's High Court for the first time on Monday, here are some details about the case and the background of lawsuits against the British press:
but how does that have to do with what democrats passed last fall? this is about lowering allowing them to negotiate the prices of drugs. basically, if if you budgeted and you got $15,000 and you go and buy a car and it now costs $12,000, that doesn t mean i only have $12,000. it means you didn t spend all $15,000. right? kaitlan, two things. first off, what they did last fall is going to reduce life saving drugs. the republicans proposed was not a reduction in medicaid benefits. it was a cut. and jake tapper said that is a cut. so cnn says it s not a cut if democrats do it. it is a cut if republicans do it. i mean what else can you say? that s exactly you have, you know, i see what you re saying. you have talked to jake tapper? why did he say it s a cut if republicans do it. i m not sure what jake tapper said is relevant to this particular point is on what you re claiming about the cost of drugs costing less and, therefore, being a cut. everyone else said that is not true. i
simply not true. okay, so if they if the did the same fact checkers go back and look at what jake tapper said? i mean, i don t get why if one party proposes efficiencies, that s a cut. reducing spending is not the same as cutting benefits. that s going to reduce life saving drugs. i understand you re saying it has an impact. i understand you re saying it has an impact on drugs. that is different though than saying that they cut medicare when they re saving money on the cost of what the drugs cost to americans. then why did jake tapper say that is a cut. i m sorry, senator. i don t think that is the defense you think it s i want to go back to this point on medicare and social security. you re saying that is not what yo
More attention must be paid to the role pollution plays in the spread of antibiotic-resistant bacteria, known as superbugs, to eliminate a ‘pandemic level threat,’ a United Nations report said
that democrats have cut medicare by $300 million or so. but that is not the case. that is not what happened with the inflation reduction act. what is your point with saying that that? they cut $280 billion out of medicare. they didn t cut it. basically, it was part of the being able to negotiate the prescription drug prices. so changing what they are spending on it is not equal to cuts, right? okay. so if that s true, then every time you figure out how to save money on medicare, that s not a cat. but that s not what the democrats say. $2 $ $280 billion reduction in spending it s going to make sure that there are new life saving drugs that you are not created. why would we do that? you can figure out there is efficiency you can create. you don t just say i m going to cut $280 billion and make sure that we don t get some life saving drugs. it s going to happen. it is starting to happen. it could be in you know,