, what concerns mobilization, because we still have well, sovkova, im sorry, the system is called the tcc, but in fact the same military commissars are still subordinate to the Ground Forces of ukraine, the commanders of their home Ground Forces. What should the ministry of defense as an administrative body do on the front line . For our army. He should take these issues upon himself, including well, as i said about policy information. It seems to me that here we need to give more opportunities to our general staff to inform about the real situation at the front or to representatives of certain operational commands there. Ah, no. The ministry of defense , the ministry of defense, it can only provide information about , for example, the types of weapons that are supplied because it is their parish, about, for example, some important innovations regarding procurement, about all this. So it can inform the ministry of defense because it is within their authorized functions, but regarding t
For centuries, but the whole world has already convinced us of our independence not to be trampled not to be drowned not to be burned not to be shot and the greater our hatred is stronger, our independence is closer, our victory is closer, we prove our independence every day, we are afraid in every way, we cry, we laugh through tears, we shudder at the news here and abroad, in the trenches and in the rear, and with all our might we clench our teeth and move on because we have something that does not extinguish our secret strength the source of which is in ourselves every day, every second, i am familiar with these feelings we were the director, we were sitting in the basement, women and children were constantly hearing explosions i slept dressed, i had to be ready to get up and run at any moment, but i said no, this is my life, i will not give it to anyone, i went on live broadcasts, i understood. If i have these powers and will share them with the ukrainians, with the children who wer
[000 00 00;00] ukraine, we are our brothers and sisters, they will abandon our witches, i myself have never been oleksandr sklyar, i was born and grew up in kharkiv, in a city that suffers daily from russian weapons. I know that poltava has become a home for tens of thousands of immigrants, and for me it has become a second hometown, where the best years of my career were spent. We thank the armed forces of ukraine for the opportunity to play football. Really, just like the classics, because there is no zloty, comparing all the gold against freedom, it is just a swamp, but only now, when they try to subjugate us again , not metaphorically, but literally, when they try to capture or destroy. We are paying, the war is going on and not only for the territories, it is also a war for the minds russia is throwing millions of petrodollars to turn ukrainians into little russians ukraine will become russia analysis and analysis of information about ukraine by russian propagandists specific fact
Professor, looking back 50 years to 1967 was it possible for the u. S. To win the war in vietnam . Simple answer, no. I would definitely say no. It wupt a war for the United States to win or lose. Take us to the end of 1967 and politically that president ial elections are happening in 1968. Whats on the horizon . Lbj was there a fair amount of difficulty. The democrats had lost not control over congress but lbj had lost 47 democratic seats in the house and two in the senate. The war was damaging lbjs pop la la la populari popularity. I think what you see is a kindovkind of breakup that lbj depended on to one of the biggest landslides in american president ial history. You could see it was a thing of the past and that the coalition was fracturing into any number of pieces. Here on American History tv all weekend long we are focusing on the war in vietnam. For the next hour and a half we are going to focus on the state of t of the war in 1967. Our guests are professor leann hang win. Als
Professor lienhang nguyen, looking back 50 years to 1967, was it still possible at that point to the u. S. To win the war in vietnam . Simple answer, no. I would definitely say no. It wasnt a war for the United States to win or lose and by 1967 it was not in the cards. Mark lawrence, take us to the end of 1967 and politically the president ial elections are happening in 1968. Whats on the horizon for Lyndon Johnson . Well lbj was in a fair amount of political difficulty. In the 1966 elections the democrats have lost not control over congress which is an important point, but he had lbj had lost 47 democratic seats in the house and two seats in the senate. This was a significant setback. The war was certainly damages his political popularity and you could see a decline across 1967. More importantly what you see across 1967 and leading into 1968 is a breakup of that coalition that lbj depended on and been so effectively in 1964 to one of the biggest landslides in american president ial hi