it s not rwanda in 2018, and there may well be some sunshine it s rwanda in 2023 and onwards, and that s quite different. in northern ireland, but the cloud will build up, bringing more showers but the problem, through the day, particularly across northern england. for the south, as i said, rwanda. wales and the midlands, a dull day, rwanda is not a free country. misty over the hills in the what happened in 2018 can south west, light rain or drizzle, happen also in 2023, because as of today. temperatures not changing very much. it is going to be a chilly week i can tell example. we are politicians, ahead, early frost before the cloud we are in opposition. increases, that will lift the temperatures by the end of the week for example, we cannot express our mind without we are labelled just a little bit, but bringing the enemies of the country. chance of some rain. huw. 16 members of my political party thanks, darren. and that s bbc news at ten are in prison today, on monday 24t
relative village of your talk about the let s stop turning these instances into factional fights and talk about the material conditions for the people. i(eir talk about the material conditions for the people- for the people. keir starmer isn t here and diane for the people. keir starmer isn t here and diane abbott for the people. keir starmer isn t here and diane abbott wrote i for the people. keir starmer isn t here and diane abbott wrote the | here and diane abbott wrote the letter, for which she apologised, so i think which talk about that. i m now going to talk to the actor tracey and oban. and i can speak now to the actress tracey ann oberman. you left the labour party because of basic anti semitism. i you left the labour party because of basic anti-semitism. basic anti-semitism. i did, and jeremy corbyn. basic anti-semitism. i did, and jeremy corbyn, unfortunately l basic anti-semitism. i did, and i jeremy corbyn, unfortunately for the there was a rise in vernacular and t
that letter and her explanation for what happened- that letter and her explanation for what happened. the defence that it was an earlier what happened. the defence that it was an earlier draft? what happened. the defence that it was an earlier draft? yes, - what happened. the defence that it was an earlier draft? yes, so i what happened. the defence that it was an earlier draft? yes, so one . was an earlier draft? yes, so one bi factor was an earlier draft? yes, so one big factor in was an earlier draft? yes, so one big factor in diane was an earlier draft? yes, so one big factor in diane abbott s i was an earlier draft? yes, so one| big factor in diane abbott s favour will be her quick reaction yesterday when she said what she said was wrong. where she is likely to face more question is her claim that the mistake arose because of what she described as an initial draft of his letter was sent to the observer i have to say there is a degree of scepticism about that explanation f
that, while due process must take place, tragically, diane abbott has put herself in a position which makes it very difficult for her to stand as a labour pa rty candidate . so diane abbott is now censured, alongside her longtime ally, jeremy corbyn, who is still suspended from the plp after declining to withdraw comments he made suggesting the scale of anti semitism had been overstated. nick is here. first of all, what do you think diane abbott s future is in the labour party? i diane abbott s future is in the labour party? diane abbott s future is in the labour party? i would say that in the balance- labour party? i would say that in the balance. one labour party? i would say that in the balance. one labour- labour party? i would say that in the balance. one labour source. labour party? i would say that in i the balance. one labour source said, this is a serious matter. there is an investigation by the labour party which will have a formal element to it and we don t expect t
factual, and. to not keir starmer s moves are factual, and. not keir starmer s moves are factual, and. ., , . ., , factual, and. to be clear, she was talkin: factual, and. to be clear, she was talking about factual, and. to be clear, she was talking about people factual, and. to be clear, she was talking about people of factual, and. to be clear, she was talking about people of gypsy, i factual, and. to be clear, she wasl talking about people of gypsy, roma and traveller background as well. sure, i read the letter, i m aware of it. edit sure, i read the letter, i m aware of it. . , ., ., sure, i read the letter, i m aware of it. . i. ., ., sure, i read the letter, i m aware of it. . ., ., ., of it. of which you are one, and i wonder how of it. of which you are one, and i wonder how denigrating. i of it. of which you are one, and i wonder how denigrating. as i l of it. of which you are one, and i i wonder how denigrating. as i said, i thou . ht wonder how denigrating. as i said,