year. it s unbelievable the numbers you are seeing for the congressman from this area tony gonzales says he s glad were showing people this and he doesn t want people to forget that they re being overwhelmed because he says the lives of the people living in these border communities have been turned upside down. jon: griff jenkins reporting live from the border. is the border crisis heats up, immigration is one of the issues on what the supreme court is expected to issue a major opinion this week and we also wait decisions on environmental protection agency power as well as religious freedom. let s bring in paul weisselberg former independent counsel in the lewinsky investigation, president clinton s probe. also a fox news contributor. it s good to have you with us his evening pre-discipline court decision on roe v. wade made all
has, and yet he has shown a reticence he doesn t want to go beyond the report that he s already filed. what do you think? i think he will stay within the four corners of the report. what the democrats can hope for is that he will tell it in a coherent narrative, from beginning to end, as if it were a story, much in the same way that ken starr did when he testified about the whitewater/lewinsky investigation. ken starr brought that story to life. mueller has the capacity to do the same if he desires to, but it s not clear what his interests are. john, after your experience with watergate, what are the key questions that you think democrats should be asking? well, i think the democrats are going to try and bring it to life. they ll ask questions like, do you think it was left to the congress to decide whether or not he obstructed justice? do you in fact think the president did obstruct justice?
in fact some went as far as to say he was an agent of russia which is ludicrous. yet here we are today trying to make sense of an investigation that happened 22 months into it. we need to go after the bad guys which is russia and not the president of the united states. will you concede that it would be inconsistent when this report comes out for republicans to talk about it vindicating the president if they called it a witch hunt and called it not necessary and all the things you just said? i don t know how it could be inconsistent. we said there was no collusion. in fact, i ve come on your show before to say there s not any collusion. yet, sunday after sunday adam schiff, jerry nadler and others said there s evidence and collusion. what we find is an independent investigator said there s going
democratic national committee as part of the russian government s attempt to help trump. none of which has risen to the criminal level. no, it hasn t, as far as we know. we know there was collusion. why there s no indictments we don t know. we know a number of things. we know the president pressured the fbi to go easy, to stop investigating flynn and various other people. we know he fired the fbi director to, as he put it, take care of the russian thing, in order to stop the investigation of various people associated with him. we know he con kogted the lie about the russian meeting.
ends, a political fight is just beginning. the president, law makers on both sides of the aisle woke up prepared to respond to the report. we know robert mueller is recommending no furtaher indictments. that revelation has some republicans declaring a win for the president after almost two years of russia cloud hanging over his administration. for their part democrats are demanding the full report be released and pushing ahead into their own investigation into the president and his associates. i want to go to jerry nadler of new york. thank you for joining me this morning, sir. good morning. on our reporting that there will be no further indictments on the mueller probe that means no member of the trump campaign was charged with conspiring with