findings. let s go step by step. forget about the fact that you said what i said was erroneous. it is. i didn t say any of the things you re saying. why did you say i was doing it for political purposes. i said you were going after political opponents of mr. trump. i m the president s attorney. that s what joe biden is, that s what hillary clinton is. joe biden is presumed innocent. but somebody has got to investigate him for going to the president of the ukraine and telling him i m not going to give you that s fine. but you re working under authority of the president. no, no, no, no. when the new prosecutor that joe put in came in, he not only dismissed the case on hunter biden, forgetting about $6 million in laundered money the prosecutor that was removed, which of the original intrigue on joe biden, that prosecutor was removed, first of all, by consensus of a multiple of western countries and it was after hunter biden s stuff was
ukraine that a man named telechenko, something like that, that he produced a phony affidavit that was given to the american authorities and an fbi agent named greenwood. and they found him guilty of that. nobody reports that in the united states because you don t report things that are favorable to the president and negative to democrats. rudy, listen let me go further about my findings. hold on a second. let s go step by step. forget about the fact that you said what i said was erroneous. it is. i didn t say any of the things you re saying. i don t even know if they re true. well, then why did you say i was doing it for political purposes? i didn t say political purposes. i said you were going after political opponents of mr. trump. that s what hillary clinton is. that s what joe biden is. joe biden is presumed innocent. but somebody has got to investigate him for going to the president of the ukraine and telling him i m not going to
confirmed as attorney general, and they would not permit a sitting president to be indicted. but even if he is not indicted, impeachment is still on the table. nancy pelosi didn t rule that out either today. of course not. look, i think a substantial portion of her party would like to impeach the president and believes there s already enough on the table to do so. she is saying let s not get thaefd mueller investigation. let s go step by step. there s no reason for democrats to push the envelope despite pressure from their own base. and until there s an alarm to taeblg, she is right. let s play that sound one more time. many democrats are talking about impeachment. you ve said it would be sad and divisive for the country. it would be. to pursue impeachment. are you willing to rule it out? we have to wait and see what happens with the mueller report. we shouldn t be impeaching for a
violence. they are not pulled by isis. they grab isis as justification for violence that they were probably intending on doing anyway. we may learn an awful lot about that process. thanks so much. we always appreciate having your expertise on with us. thank you. let s go back to lower manhattan, the scene of the terror attack. that is where chris is reporting this morning. reporter: all right. let s go step-by-step by what we understand right now. we are getting areas from patterson, new jersey not because there is an active threat. authorities say they are trying to seize upon all intelligence they can at this point to figure out what motivation there was for this murder, this terrorist. they have access to his computer. they want to interview the people that are close to him. that is what we are being told.
access to the clinton campaign through the steele dossier. how? they didn t have any access. they were denied each time. michael steele was a uk former british agent, christopher steel. he was a former uk intelligence agency accessing sources. this wasn t russians coming to hillary. it was russians. and saying we ve got the goods and them saying great. you re missing a few steps here. let s go step by step. ooi hillary clinton s campaign and the democratic national committee paid a cutout lawyer who paid fusion gps who paid a british spy to buy information from russian spies, russian intelligence material. a lot of that is that s a chain of events in an opposition research process that is beyond the pail of what s accepted in