Shorts to secure a deal before the elections. How do strongman leaders been twist democracy to fit their will you could look to russia but its whaler and then there is turkey president erda ones Political Party lost control of its stamboul in municipal elections back in march it was such a shock to air to one that next month is stamboul will repeat its election tonight ill ask her to ones a key party whats the plan next time to make sure the will of the people follows the plan of the president im bringing off in berlin this is the day. Shuttle launch has been cheating has been corruption well this is clear and unambiguous and the list came from somebody who doesnt want to lose his policy so
its no surprise because my fellow citizens are trying to take away the elections we won on the Evening Of March The Thirty first they have tried to steal alcohols work this is a preplanned game and the election authorities are part of. This decision doesnt represent voters it clearly has been meetin
Anybody else. Im going to read from the transcript here. Why didnt you go to your direct report, mr. Morrison, your response, because mr. Eisenberg had told me to take my concerns to him. And then i asked you, did mr. Eisenberg tell you not to report, to go around mr. Morrison . And you said, actually, he did say that, i shouldnt talk to any other people. Is that right . Yes, but theres a whole theres a period of time in there between when i spoke to him and when he circled back around. It wasnt that long a period of time, but it was enough time for me to enough time for you to go to talk to someone who you wont tell us who it is, right . Ive been instructed not to, representative jordan. Heres what im getting. The lawyer told you not talk to any other people, and you interpret that as not talking to your boss, but you talk to your brother, you talk to the lawyers, you talk to scare keec kent and talk to the one guy schiff wont let us tell you who it is. Representative jordan, i did my
after all. i want to unpack this text with you. because he is acting it seems as an adviser here right? the committee right that hannity is indeed a fact witness who they need to hear from? absolutely. let s unpack it a little bit, don. he is essentially saying that in advance of the actual january 6th occurrence he has some information about how the president was briefed on how it might go. the idea of laying out some sort of strategy or thinking about how this might actually come to fruition. that is advanced notice, number one. number two, how he essentially conceded president trump lost to the incoming president joe biden. now the current president of the united states. so he is saying, listen. the jig is up essentially. go to florida because you have influence there. talk about voting reform. talking about a concession at that point in time. also you have the very real statement about the notion of listen. if sean hannity had advance
good evening to you. doctor, let s start with the new guidance from the cdc, shortening the isolation period for someone with a positive test but no symptoms to five days. but there s no required test at the end of those five days to end the quarantine. is this the best message knowing how contagious omicron is? yeah, i don t think they got this one right, don. i think there is an imperative to try and shorten the length of time people are in isolation, particularly for hospitals and clinics and airplanes and all sorts of reasons, but most people will not be infectious at five days, but some people still will, so i think the better message would have been five days and then a rapid test or better yet, two days in a row to have negative rapid tests before you come out of isolation. they also need to strengthen the message about wearing a mask. the idea is you come out of isolation, but you should still wear a very good mask, and i would say an n95 for another five days just to be abso
authoritarian force. it has financiers. it has propagandists and the propagandists are formed by okay if. it is that simple. let s don t confuse it. he is not a ron brownstein here. so fox is an arm of the republican party. basically they use fox, the republican party uses fox to push out their propaganda. yeah. he s not a white house staffer but he is more important than 99% of the white house staffers. ron, what did you want to say? i agree. i think it is not exactly an arm of the republican party in the sense that it has independent agency itself but it kind of a force in the conservative movement that isolates its viewers in kind of you know an artificial world. and the success, overwhelming numbers of republicans who believe despite no evidence that biden was elected only because of massive fraud, 3/4 in polling