Essentially that the president of the United States has said, you republicans care about defense. Youre not getting any more money for defence unless i get more money for nondefense. Thats a big conflict. So the process we move forward met the Defense Departments request and president s request for defense but has not met nondefense increases, all of which on defense and nondefense are barred. Captions Copyright National cable satellite corp. 2008 captioning performed by vitac really tried to work with us more than anyone else has. 1961, 51 of the budget. Now it is 15 . That is a problem. It is the lowest percentage since world war ii, but that is not the problem we are addressing today. What we are talking about is the tooth and the tail. Hagel suckedtary to shrink the headquarters and major combat command staff. Secretary carter indicated a target 20 reduction of the staff during his time as to be secretary and in august of this year, the Deputy Defense costtary ward said reductions
Scholars and a really looking to decide the legal issues in the cases. Michael i think that is in the slaughterhouse cases as well, the professor giving a full rebuttal, it is a scholarly, wellwritten opinion. It has banker sized bitterly by criticized bitterly by scholars, it was a decision that applied the rules, at least looking at the legislature. Host you tell us in your book, miller had aspirations and was even hopeful for the presidency and you write that he was long considered to be a key figure in the unraveling of reconstruction. Does he deserve that legacy . Michael he does not. Because the slaughterhouse case it is not apply to the states, White Supremacy is restored after the reconstruction, African Americans could have rights,o the bill of rights, to fight legislation and it when you look for where that doesnt happen, the slaughterhouse case. In when you read the opinion protecting africanamerican right, you know that is not what was intended. The washington journal we ha
Courts opinions which revealed the agency was broadly collecting americans internet communication here in the United States, and misrepresenting the scope of that effort. Cnn justice reporter evan perez has the story, and he joins us with details. It has points inside the United States where it can look at and monitor emails and other internet traffic, and what it was doing was beyond doing the collecting of foreign intelligence, is what theyre supposed to be doing, trying to prevent terrorism, there were also incidentally, mistakenly they say, collecting domestic information. This is a big nono. This is not what theyre supposed to be doing. The court ruled that not only had they been violaten the law, but misrepresenting what they were supposed to be doing for three years. So the judge is very upset. They cant just say, oops, our bad. How do they explain why this was happening . Well, you know essentially what the nsa had come up with, in their own minds and in their own perhaps far a
We asked ChatGPT for legal advice – here are five reasons why you shouldn't - Philippine Canadian Inquirer Nationwide Filipino Newspaper canadianinquirer.net - get the latest breaking news, showbiz & celebrity photos, sport news & rumours, viral videos and top stories from canadianinquirer.net Daily Mail and Mail on Sunday newspapers.