bogus charge to begin with. they re setting perjury traps. thank god don mcgahn didn t fall into one. this is even more outrageous. give us what we demand or we re going to throw you out of office. we can t there s another thing that could have been done besides going to court. could have passed a bill requiring the president to do certain things, turn over certain things and gotten the senate to agree, president vetoes it. you override the veto. which is what happened to andrew johnson. then you could really have a legitimate obstruction of congress. it s not just obstruction of a majority and one-half of the congress. but that wasn t done either. and even if that had been done, either the president or congress would end up having to go to the supreme court to get the courts to say this was a lawful act, but in the case of congress and
they are setting the perjury traps. thank god don mcgann didn t fall into one. this is even more outrages. give us what we demand or we are going to throw you out of offi office. there is another thing that could ve been done besides going to court, could have passed a bill requiring the president to do certain things didn t turn over certain things and gotten the senate to agree, the president vetoes it, you override the veto, which is kind of what happened to andrew johnson, then you could really have a legitimate obstruction of congress, not just obstruction of a majority in one half of the congress. that wasn t done either. even if that had been done, the president or the congress would ve gone the supreme court to get the courts to save this was a lawful act. in the case of congress and
charge to begin with. they are setting perjury traps. thank god don mcgahn didn t fall into one. but this is even more outrageous. give us what we demand or we are going to throw you out of office. there is another thing that could have been done besides going to court. could ve passed a bill requiring the president to do certain things, turn over certain things and gotten the senate to agree the president vetoes it, you override the veto. then which is kind of what happened to andrew johnson. then you could really have a legitimate obstruction of congress. it s not just obstruction of a majority in one half of the congress. but that wasn t done either. and even if that had been done, either the president or the congress would end up having to go to the supreme court to get the courts to say this was a lawful act. but in the case of congress and
and ask them to investigate a political opponent. well, was he a political opponent at the time? that s a question. i m not sure he had declared or not, but i think he had not. eric: july 25th. he s out and running. the phone call was on july 25th so of course he s a political opponent. well, i don t have a problem with asking another government to conduct a lawful act. certainly there was an investigation on mr. biden and his son. i don t have a problem with that. but you know what, eric? what we say doesn t matter. what matters is votes. we can debate back and forth as friends whether or not this was legal or illegal. what matters here is what s in the eyes of the beholder, which is the congress? if they think it is a high crime or misdemeanor, not a misdemeanor, high crime, then they can vote for impeachment. we have a difference of opinion a little bit here, but it doesn t matter what we think. it only matters what the votes are. you and i are used to working