Necessary. I think everybody is going to want the court, but just so everyone would understand what the ground rules or, those are the ground rules. More important, i wanted the American Public to have a chance to be heard. Today as we know, we will consider the nomination of james comey, jr. To be in the federal investigation, the current director started just a week before the terrorist attack of september 11th. We know the world has changed dramatically. In that time weve often debated the National Security while protecting the freedom and liberty and the privacy rights and that define us as a great nation. That is alive today and the confirmation hearing provides another opportunity to evaluate an existing policy and to correct the course. Few positions have as much impact on the liberty and National Security as the director of the fbi. And as the president s nominee, the senate has sent Important Role in this debate and that of course begins here in this committee. I welcome him a
Rose additional funding provided by these funders. And by bloomberg, a provider of multimedia news and Information Services worldwide. From our studios in new york city, this is charlie rose. Rose we are at the Supreme Court of the United States in washington, the nine justices that occupy its chambers carry a heavy responsibility. They have the final say on the law of the land. The principles and idea that guide their decisions are the subject of heated debate. Justice Antonin Scalia is the longest serving justice currently on the court, he is the leading voice for a conservative judicial philosophy known as textualism, some talk about it as originalism. It asserts that laws must be interpreted as they were understood by the men who wrote them. In 2006, Justice Elena kagan, then the dean of hear extraordinary law school, scalias alma mater says he is the justice who has had the most important impact over the years on how we think and talk about law. He originally coauthored a new book
Rose additional funding provided by these funders. And by bloomberg, a provider of multimedia news and Information Services worldwide. From our studios in new york city, this is charlie rose. Rose we are at the Supreme Court of the United States in washington, the nine justices that occupy its chambers carry a heavy responsibility. They have the final say on the law of the land. The principles and idea that guide their decisions are the subject of heated debate. Justice Antonin Scalia is the longest serving justice currently on the court, he is the leading voice for a conservative judicial philosophy known as textualism, some talk about it as originalism. It asserts that laws must be interpreted as they were understood by the men who wrote them. In 2006, Justice Elena kagan, then the dean of hear extraordinary law school, scalias alma mater says he is the justice who has had the most important impact over the years on how we think and talk about law. He originally coauthored a new book
Gives the house the sole power of impeachment and the power to determine its own rules. When president nixon, during the time he was going to be impeached, the chairman of the Rules Committee, chairman madden, actually spoke on house floor and announced there would be a rule governing how that proceeding would move forward. When the clinton articles of impeachment were brought forward, there was a unanimous consent request to kind of govern how we conducted ourselves. And im not sure how likely it would be that we would get a unanimous consent request. I would like to ask unanimous consent without objection to enter into the record a letter sent to the chairman of the Judiciary Committee signed by 70 republican members including kevin mccarthy, the republican leader, and basically, and let me read the key lines here, we will avail ourselves of every parliamentary tool available to us on the committee and house floor, in other words to try to delay and make this process as
impossible as
Power to determine its own rules. When president nixon during the time he was going to be impeached ruling how that proceeding would go forward. When the Clinton Impeachment was brought forward, there was a unanimous consent request to govern how we conducted ourselves and im not sure how likely it would be that we would get a unanimous consent request. Id like to ask unanimous consent without objection to enter into the record a letter that was sent to the chairman of the Judiciary Committee signed by 70 republican members including the republican leader every parliamentary tool available to us and committee on the house floor, to highlight your inaction translated means to try to delay them to make this process as impossible as it can be made. Im not sure in light of this letter that we could get a unanimous consent request and these seedings and break for a cup of coffee, never mind, i just want to stay for the record because i think its important that i think the house has engaged