rights, but maybe who would he ask questions of? three law school professors and a staff member? not a lot of due process there. i yield a minute and a half to the gentleman from texas. gentleman is recognized for a minute and a half. madam speaker, we re here today because house democrats have spent upwards of $30 million in three years trying to overturn the 2016 election of president trump and come up with nothing. because of their radical left wing, democrats are willing to make all future presidential elections invalid until judged worthy by the majority in the house of representatives. the president of the united states does not serve at the pleasure of the house of representatives. perhaps the greatest reality regarding president trump is acknowledging that under his policies, things are actually going much better than they have in decades for working americans. we are a democratic constitutional republic in which power flows from we the people to our president and elected
in four law school professors, two staff members and that s the only hearings you have to provide any opportunity for the president to question. i ve heard from my majority colleagues, and as a former defense attorney i think it s funny. if he s innocent, tell him to come prove it. one is that every part of what we should be doing here. i don t think any of my civil libertarians, they ought to be laying awake at night thinking how can i be associated with this. no owner what you think, there s a way to do it fairly. they have been trying to do it for three years. mr. raskin s, did you have any conversations with chairman schiff about the contents of the report? i am certain i have along the way, yes. really? no one evidently on our side had any conversations. to your knowledge, did chairman nadler have conversations with chairman schiff about the contents of the reports? you mean the substance of the
the majority pretties this up no way you can call in four law school professors, two staff members and that s the only hearings to provide any opportunity for the president to question and get anything out of them. i have heard from my majority colleagues, as a former defense attorney is funny, if he s innocent come prove it. when is that ever a part of what we should be doing here? really? i don t think my civil libertarians in the democratic aisle laying awake how can i be associated with this. no matter what you think there is a way to do this fairly. they still out number us and they ve been trying to do this for three years. mr. raskin, did you have conversation with chairman schiff about the contents of the report? i am certain i have along the way, yes. really? because nobody on our side evidently had any conversations. to your knowledge, did chairman nadler have any conversation with chairman schiff about the contents of the report? i m certain.
daughter was downstairs in the basement. duct tape. laura: congressman buck, there s no words left trying to conjure them up here. what are you doing? making your christmas list? what are you doing in that front? i was texting with a lot of friends but it s absolutely absurd. arguments were made over and over and over again. we did not see any eyewitnesses, four law school professors in there to talk about it with us, but nothing substantive a game out of the judiciary proceedings. one week fiduciary committee met, one week. absolutely absurd to go through this process. laura: they are taking this so seriously that congressman found out just a few weeks ago was watching golf was it his phone, guys? it was a laptop.