the road to medicare for all, precisely the road the gop says it takes but no doubt is unconstitutional. the case is set aside for oral arguments for six hours over three days, the most a court has spent on a case in 45 days. the average case just gets one hour. the crazy thing is there are no cameras or transcripts allowed, even though 3000 people slated to get health care could lose it. why should we see if nine lekd people throw ought a policy change in a generation? we start with mike sachs, and jeffrey rosen, george washington law professor. welcome, gentlemen. mar mike, let me start with you. there are four separate legal issues the state is taking up. i ll start with the main event. the first biggest case that s coming before is on tuesday, actually. the cases start on monday, but on tuesday there will be two hours dedicated to the constitutionality of the original mandate. the next day there will abe case about an hour and a half over whether if a mandate falls, oth
he will also discuss an amendment he co-authored that places distinctions on foreign institutions. the senate and unanimously approved it last week what hundred-0. a similar measure is awaiting a vote in the house. there is much more to the newly designed [unintelligible] . more video picking it is easy to watch today s events there is much more on the newly designed c-span.org. you can receive an e-mail alert when your program is scheduled to air. more availability, use our candy channel finder to see were the three c-span networks are available on satellite and cable companies across the country. at the all know c-span.org. the richard nixon foundation hosted a form of the 37th labor and employment policies. former labor secretaries that served with within the nixon, ford administration talked about affirmative action and the relationship between the white house and labor unions. this is about 90 minutes. good morning. welcome to another in our series of legacy fo
co-sponsors these forums. what makes the nixon administration interesting is it marks the beginning of the foundation of the modern president. what happened in the course of the nixon administration as that policy-making was drawn from the cabinet into the white house. before, the cabinet department ran their own areas except on giant issues. beginning with the administration and lasting through today, policy is made in the white house. while the cabinet has input, they execute decisions made within the white house. how did that come about? for reorganization. first the revitalization of the national security council where foreign policy was made within the white house. second, the creation of the domestic council under john ehrlichman which did the same thing on major domestic issues. finally, the transition of the old budget to the office of management and budget which counted the money and help to department s reach accomplishments. that was under george shultz. he was the
biography i did justice sandra day o connor who was such a pioneering individual, who was such a natural as a subject. but he s, in some ways, he s one of the nine, he s a conservative certainly, he s outspoken, but why focus so much on him? but his, he is, he is an original. i mean, you know firsthand. you ve been following him and being close to him for decades. he s, he s so distintive in his style, you know, the opera viewing with ruth bader ginsburg, duck hunting with dick cheney, but his approach to the law and his approach to life is such a wide embrace that he is distinctive among his black-robed peers. .. guest: there were times when i would go to watch him speak and he would stand up and i would start to let because he has this showman s movement about him, that s both operatic but also, go. just the way justice scalia even composes his opinion, he said he sits on his computer, he puts on his classical music and he starts to conduct as if he is doing a symphony. s
open, and yet, from here, you could respond, maybe even better. to any activity or to relational conversation, and often in a retreat i will have people from here start to do a dialogue with each other and feel what s that is like to start including language. . . what you think about that? actually it made me think also about one of the techniques we talked about a lot in this new book is actually not be something very similar to what you re saying at the end which is we certainly recognize that if compassion and the ability to interact and communicate with other people is so crucial for our brains in terms of being healthy and crucial for our overall well-being when the be wonderful to bec x able to reay take that kind of a state and take that kind of a practice and integrate into a dialogue? son conjunction with michael author we have been developing something we call compassion and communication or reduce something very similar to that but then it do began to bring peop