deal. jay harvey wilkerson wrote an op-ed in the times the other day what i thought was a shot in the bow. he said, if courts read the snugs in such a way that it enables them to make congress infectual, the risk should escape no one, making ourhile other nations flex their muscle. if you read between the lines, jeff, i thought he was trying to send a signal that someone like him who was on the short list of george bush s appointees basically think the law is unconstitutional. that was a very strong point, and he pointed that out in his book. he says he find the health care reform misconceived as a policy matter, but it would be just as active for people to strike it down as if it was gay marriage.
the system implodes. this is insurance 101. so if republicans get the short-term political win they want, it s sure to rise to 50 or 60 million and we ll end up on the road to medicare for all, precisely the road the gop says it takes but no doubt is unconstitutional. the case is set aside for oral arguments for six hours over three days, the most a court has spent on a case in 45 days. the average case just gets one hour. the crazy thing is there are no cameras or transcripts allowed, even though 3000 people slated to get health care could lose it. why should we see if nine lekd people throw ought a policy change in a generation? we start with mike sachs, and jeffrey rosen, george washington law professor. welcome, gentlemen. mar mike, let me start with you. there are four separate legal issues the state is taking up. i ll start with the main event. the first biggest case that s coming before is on tuesday, actually. the cases start on monday, but on tuesday there will be
the road to medicare for all, precisely the road the gop says it takes but no doubt is unconstitutional. the case is set aside for oral arguments for six hours over three days, the most a court has spent on a case in 45 days. the average case just gets one hour. the crazy thing is there are no cameras or transcripts allowed, even though 3000 people slated to get health care could lose it. why should we see if nine lekd people throw ought a policy change in a generation? we start with mike sachs, and jeffrey rosen, george washington law professor. welcome, gentlemen. mar mike, let me start with you. there are four separate legal issues the state is taking up. i ll start with the main event. the first biggest case that s coming before is on tuesday, actually. the cases start on monday, but on tuesday there will be two hours dedicated to the constitutionality of the original mandate. the next day there will abe case about an hour and a half over whether if a mandate falls, oth