montreal, canada for judge judy. caller: i would like to know what you think about having the terror trials in your city and what would you do if you ever tried them? i certainly don t think the trials belong in new york city. larry: you don t. and i have serious misgivings about trying them in a civilian court. i think that we are in a circumstance in this country where we are under siege as are many countries around the world that are under siege by people who are intent on creating chaos. and i think that we have to be careful. people who are in that circumstance should not place our civilians at risk by affo affording them certain rights
also who saw other people not working and they were working for minimum wage and they said, what do i have to work for? i could stay home and not work? larry: they were the minority, weren t they? most people on welfare need welfare? let me tell you, larry, i did a case you know, one person you speak to one person that represents 100 people or 200 people, if somebody writes you a letter that is a thousand letters. so, i had one case today and i had one every time i tape. there was a guy who was being sued by a woman for something and he had lived with another woman for ten years. and as it turns out, because i ask the questions, as it turns out, he was living with this other woman for ten years, they had this 3-year-old child, he is not supposed to be living there because she and the child get welfare. so i said to him, i asked him all the questions, but before he could figure out where i was going, he was nailed. now, that s one case.
job isn t hard, i don t have to learn any lines, i don t have to do anything, the only thing i have to do is age gracefully larry: and show up. and that shooting in alabama, we re going to take with judge judy about it ahead. [ male announcer ] all we ask is that you keep doing what you ve always done. the lexus rx. never has a vehicle been designed to feel so natural. see your lexus deale - ditched my used subcompact for a two-wheeled ride - now i m rolling eco-friendy but i still look bad when the bike store saw my credit they said this was all they had i m singing- f to the r to the to the e to the c to the r to the e-d-i-t,
has an intellect. i honestly don t think that if they did a criminal background check on her they would have discovered any of those things. the incident in the i-hop was probably sealed because it was a misdemeanor, she was never charged with a homicide in 1986, but equally disturbing to me is the case in new york where someone who was a convicted sex offender was hired as a superintendent of a building and given keys to apartments. i believe that was the circumstance. and people, employers who are placing their employees in a circumstance where they can place other people at risk are going to find that they re insurers of the safety of the people who rely on them. and so in colleges this woman would not have been found out, but others might. larry: let s take a call from
that we give american citizens that are tried here. for instance if you are interrogating somebody who find out whether they placed a bomb on a plane and you mirandize them first and give them a lawyer, the chances are you re not going to find out whether that s going to happen. and it s my understanding that the people who are go to be tried were not mirandized before they were questioned. when you re tried, it s important that if you make a statement prior to being mirandized that it won t stick. i don t necessarily think that will make us a panacea around the world of justice trying these people in civilian court to make us look absolutely meticulous. larry: the crime was committed in new york. the ultimate act. the conspiracy was not. the ultimate act may have been in new york city.