yesterday, when the new broke that fox had reached a last-minute settlement wit dominion over the networks false claims about the 202 election, there were surpris and there was disappointment damaged i want my trial. i want it. i guess it s satisfying, i mean, for dominion, that rupert ha to file over a bunch of cash but that does nothing for democracy. what we need is fox news personality to look straight into the camera, admit tha they lied over and over agai about the 2020 election. america did not get to wish rupert murdoch - ruppy raise his right hand and tel the truth, the truth and nothing but the whole truth. they did not get any mea culpa under oath with the country did get to se is a 787.5 million dolla concession from fox, a nearl 788 million dollar payout that suggests fox was scared of wha awaited the company at trial, price tag beginning if that it verges on something a lot of people have been searching for for a long time. that s accountability. and i
this counting electors required in states to send electors for the candidates who actually won and bans a retroactive change over rules when it comes to governing elections. those seem like pretty common sense reforms to me. but here s the thing, only nine republicans, yes, nine republicans in the house voted for that bill. perhaps unsurprisingly all of those lawmakers are set to leave congress next year. in the end, 203 republicans voted against a bill that was aimed at protecting and strengthening our democracy. over in the senate pennsylvania s patrick me one of the many soon-to-be gop retirees has signed on to his chamber s version of the bill as a cosponsor, he becomes a tenth republican to do so which means that if all democrats and independents sign on, they have enough votes to beat the usually fatal filibuster. there is no cause for celebration just yet, both chambers still have to work out some key differences in their bills before anything gets to the presidents de
taken from the former guy florida club. judge dearie demanded that the lawyers offer actual proof for trump s repeated claim that the fbi planted evidence during the search. doria also wants the legal team to formally state whether they believe the fbi lied about the documents that were seized. and goes on to say that he might ask for testimony about the search and the documents from, quote, witnesses with knowledge of the relevant facts. one more sign that the special master he, means business, he is pushing for another judge to help review the thousands of items that were found in trump s home. the former president has claimed he declassified sensitive records that he took from the white house by just thinking about it. last night he told sean hannity that he is able to do that just by thinking. apparently, that was news to some senate republicans. i think there is a process for declassifying documents. and i think it ought to be adhered to and followed. and i think tha
quote, witnesses with knowledge of the relevant facts. one more sign that the special master he, means business, he is pushing for another judge to help review the thousands of items that were found in trump s home. the former president has claimed he declassified sensitive records that he took from the white house by just thinking about it. last night he told sean hannity that he is able to do that just by thinking. apparently, that was news to some senate republicans. i think there is a process for declassifying documents. and i think it ought to be adhered to and followed. and i think that that should apply to anybody who has access to or deals with classified information. i believe, as i understand the executive branch requirements, there is a process that one must go through. for the committee, we think, because she was involved in helping organize and promote january 6th, coming to the capital pieces of her testimony be referenced or? hearing? it s possib
but they have a dragnet, basically, of information that they would like from the d.a. office and i wonder if they are concerned about, the broader fraud case those started under cy vance that dea bragg ha suggested continues in his office did they want the bread crumbs basically, that mark pomerantz might be able to give them to basically develop a strateg if and one dea bragg goe further with a broader fraud indictment, or anyone else - an argument can be made tha that s what they re doing. they did not request mr. pomerantz to produce documents but they did send a letter t d. a. bragg and requests tha he come testify and produc documents. they also sent a letter to a member of the trial team, an ask that he comment svm produc documents. and dea bragg has said that hi investigation is still continuing that s actually th investigation, but the attorne general for new york state, ha brought a lawsuit against mr trump, and his family. the laetitia james lawsuit, yes. so that could