Including ph fbiincludefiona hir senior advisor, Michael Mckinsey and the president s ambassador to the european union, gordon sondland. More interviews are scheduled for next week. Lets bring in Dan Henninger, Kyle Peterson and kim strassel. Dan, what did we learn this week from the impeachment proceedings and a lets start with the witnesses on capitol hill. Well, we pretty much learned what the democrats want us to learn and what theyre handing out to the press. Again, the hearings are being held in secret. I mean, you had to love nancy pelosi, just the most hutspah saying she appreciates the support of her caucus, pursuing this the way they have in fairness. Do you think the white house considers it fair, holding the hearings in secret . All were learning is that indeed state Department Officials were upset at the idea that they were being pressed in ukraine to include an investigation of joe biden and possibility the idea that ukraine was involved somehow in the 2016 election becau
Including ph fbiincludefiona hir senior advisor, Michael Mckinsey and the president s ambassador to the european union, gordon sondland. More interviews are scheduled for next week. Lets bring in Dan Henninger, Kyle Peterson and kim strassel. Dan, what did we learn this week from the impeachment proceedings and a lets start with the witnesses on capitol hill. Well, we pretty much learned what the democrats want us to learn and what theyre handing out to the press. Again, the hearings are being held in secret. I mean, you had to love nancy pelosi, just the most hutspah saying she appreciates the support of her caucus, pursuing this the way they have in fairness. Do you think the white house considers it fair, holding the hearings in secret . All were learning is that indeed state Department Officials were upset at the idea that they were being pressed in ukraine to include an investigation of joe biden and possibility the idea that ukraine was involved somehow in the 2016 election becau
Including ph fbiincludefiona hir senior advisor, Michael Mckinsey and the president s ambassador to the european union, gordon sondland. More interviews are scheduled for next week. Lets bring in Dan Henninger, Kyle Peterson and kim strassel. Dan, what did we learn this week from the impeachment proceedings and a lets start with the witnesses on capitol hill. Well, we pretty much learned what the democrats want us to learn and what theyre handing out to the press. Again, the hearings are being held in secret. I mean, you had to love nancy pelosi, just the most hutspah saying she appreciates the support of her caucus, pursuing this the way they have in fairness. Do you think the white house considers it fair, holding the hearings in secret . All were learning is that indeed state Department Officials were upset at the idea that they were being pressed in ukraine to include an investigation of joe biden and possibility the idea that ukraine was involved somehow in the 2016 election becau
Do you make of the white house statement that this impeachment probe is constitutionally valid invalid and violates due process. I may not use those words but i would say its constitutionally very troubling. To elaborate, the framers were ambivalent about impeachment power, debating whether to create it at all and who should exercise it. They understood that tremendous potential for misuse given the british parliamentary practice and the difficulty in cabining it a bit. They moved it to high crimes and misdemeanors, mentioning treason and bribery. What they expected was the house to unfold things with a certain decorum, follow certain procedures many i wouldnt use the word due process. I wouldnt think that applies in a constitutional sense. Paul thats what i want to focus on, david. Seems to me, you look at the language of the constitution, what it says is the house has the power to impeach, high crimes and misdemeanors and so on but it doesnt say how it goes about it. The due process
Statement that this impeachment probe is constitutionally valid invalid and violates due process. I may not use those words but i would say its constitutionally very troubling. To elaborate, the framers were ambivalent about impeachment power, debating whether to create it at all and who should exercise it. They understood that tremendous potential for misuse given the british parliamentary practice and the difficulty in cabining it a bit. They moved it to high crimes and misdemeanors, mentioning treason and bribery. What they expected was the house to unfold things with a certain decorum, follow certain procedures many i wouldnt use the word due process. I wouldnt think that applies in a constitutional sense. Paul thats what i want to focus on, david. Seems to me, you look at the language of the constitution, what it says is the house has the power to impeach, high crimes and misdemeanors and so on but it doesnt say how it goes about it. The due process protections that we think about