regulations. trump has done a lot when it comes to undoing what obama did. this is another barack obama d. this is another example. it is, there are scores of things he has done. some of those things, charlie, are what conservatives, any conservative would want a president to do. exactly. this is zero surprise here, first of all. it s not the ivanka trump administration, it s donald trump, what a shock he would fought stand up for women. secondly, as a pro-business anti-regulation president, this is pretty much consistent with what he s doing and he has been rolling back a lot of these regulations. and i think it s very likely that any republican president might have done these kinds of things, saying, yes, wooer in favor of the concept. this is overreaching federal regulation, too much interference into the business community. so on those two fronts, the number one health pro-bass anti-regulation, look, this is donald trump who is never going to be a champion for women.
there are people who want to know what was discussed and that is part of the entire investigation that wooer seeing looking into what jared s role was between the trump campaign and russia. what is interesting is the numbercalling him naive saying he did not know what was happening. this is one of the main criticisms people have of jared kushner saying that someone involved in this type of action should not be in that role, period, not having a lot of experience in how these things operate. but you have three top law enforcement officials, brennan, comey, james clapper all saying that the contact that jared kushner has had with these russian dignitaries is concern aring, where there is smoke there is fire. i mean not just talking about kislyak, but also a meeting with a top banker as well who is putin s right are the hand man. it will be interesting to see what happens out of the alleged war room being formed in the white house.
know what, i m getting rid of this fbi director. there s one data point we need to keep coming back to and back to on this, this is the timing about a week ago that comeyrosenstein, author of the ledder and asked for significantly more resources so investigate the trump/russia connection. that s something we have to come back to. that s when the wheel went into motion as best as we can tell and that letter started to in two sentences real quick. if steve is right and this person was fired over a political grudge about 2016, that s inappropriate, and if you re right, he was fired over the russia inquiry, that s inappropriate and worse. all right. as we go to break wooer, we going to listen to republican reaction. surprised me how few there were. here they are. the timing and the reasons for this decision did made little sense to me and i don t think i ve heard anything since last night that would clarify that in any way. i think the administration owes us some re
mcmaster? where is mattis? the voices of foreign policy who might converse on stability on what the u.s. is doing overseas. they re there, but my sense is they re waiting. they re not quite ready to step in and say, wooer in charge now. because there is a definite feeling if you get too far out in this white house and bannon was a part of this, will you get swatted. you could take too much attention, too much control, that s why mcmaster has been very hard to find. tillerson you pointed out, has not been breaking a lot of cover. we are waiting for these men to step up. but i think they re waiting to make sure the coast is clear. you are not saying i am. exactly. that s exactly what happened, you know, after the first executive order, where you had people rushing to the front of the line, steve bannon, stephen miller rushing to the front of the liner, let, everybody know it was their executive order, a very wise lesson was learned
results. we can t do that anymore. we can t spend money on programs because they sound good. great. meals on wheels is great. it s a state decision to fund that particular portion of it. take the federal money and give it to the states and say we want to give you money for programs that don t work. we can t defend that anymore. wooer going to spend money, spend a lot of money but not on programs that cannot show that they actually deliver the promises that we made to people. talk about programs that do work or don t work. there s a program called the shine in pennsylvania. rural counties that provide after school educational programs for individuals in those areas which just so happens to be the state that helped propel president trump to the white house. i m curious what you say to those americans that say 800 individuals will no longer, children that need it most, will no longer be provided in the most needed communities i have to memorize 4,000 line