and that is why we are seein jim jordan doing this as democrats have called it political theater, it is reall a public hearing in manhatta where he is attacking alvi bragg, trying to discredit him and it is really speaking to republican voters. that s the whole point, we v seen jim jordan s conservative trump ally come out. he now is the chair of the house judiciary committee. he is of course attacking crime, that is a huge talking point that we re seeing from a publicans as they try to kee their majority in the house. trying to win the majority i the senate we are going to continue seein that, this is only beginning stephanie. i will say i did not appreciat that succession spoiler from one of the democrat some of th soundbite you just said, but i really shows that they are trying to get to voters here using succession s comments. girl, girl, girl. that was a spoiler, that was
even sure if our government is controlled in canada. or overseas, whetherours your democracy is real. and of course, that se a familiar feeling to americans . so the freedom ofreef speech,do freefreedom of assembly and the freedom to defend yourself, including againsd t tyranny, the first two rights. hang on the third, we interviewed you at some length parthis documentary about the right to self-defense. e i want to play part of itou for our audience. one of the saddest parts for me is i ve got handguns myselft and i will probably be one of o the last canadians to own them. those guns will die with m those guns will die with mei do and then go to the government. i don t get tot hand them downr nothing. he s banning firearms that in n many cases areot not even semi automatic. we v e a thin veneer of civilization here in canada righ t. and when that thin veneer ofcivi civility crashes, the government don t want a bunch of people with guns hav that can defend themselves and have thei
but i ve got to say, we v got to remind people, at the beginning of this block we wer talking about ron desantis o the verge of signing, into effect in florida, a six-wee abortion ban so, it s very clear that it optically, politically strategically bad fo republicans. but they are full steam ahea on, it right it has not had the intende chilling effect that it should if you care about the future o your party and - i mean, to say nothing of th freedoms of the american public i do wonder, on the scotus question, on the supreme court question, there is a lot o news about clarence thomas and his dealings with harlan crow, a wealthy donor. a lot of people have ver negative opinions of this court. against that backdrop, do yo think that - i mean, do you think tha clarence thomas scandal because that s what i think it is - will affect the way justic roberts chief justice roberts might vote here? because they are aware of th hit, reputation that the court has taken, the sort of tenuous
over 240 democrats signing o saying block this texas ruling guess how many republica lawmakers signed on to it. it gets - less than 70. which shows you wher positionally this falls and it makes it without faul lines are very interesting for both the political side of thi and the legal side of this but i ve got to say, we v got to remind people, at the beginning of this block we wer talking about ron desantis o the verge of signing, into effect in florida, a six-wee abortion ban so, it s very clear that it optically, politically strategically bad fo republicans. but they are full steam ahea on, it right it has not had the intende chilling effect that it should if you care about the future o your party and - i mean, to say nothing of th freedoms of the american public i do wonder, on the scotus question, on the supreme court
they really dropped the ball and just forgot to turn this obviously relevant evidenc over it s more likely they ve bee hiding the ball, as we v alleged all along. and the reason is obvious. i don t need to make the minions arguments for them they re doing pretty well. but it seems to me, these tape go to the heart of the issue that s been left for the court for the jury, rather in the dominion case which is whether there s actua malice one could even argue, if dominion had these tapes, an by the way, there seem to be other evidence that was also withheld, from what i ve bee reading, just in the dominio case it would seem to me, if they had this evidence and had been able to use it in their summar judgment motion, maybe the would ve gotten a complete victory. you make the case in th complaint, it would be hard fo