comparemela.com

Latest Breaking News On - Kurt straif - Page 1 : comparemela.com

Viewpoint: Regulatory vigilantes — How former government scientists who are now high-paid expert witnesses for predatory law firms use mass tort litigation to sidestep science

Regulatory risk management process allowed policymakers to govern over the last 60 years of technological and industrial development.

COP28 Side Events: Children, Cities and Climate Action Lab Workshops

The Children, Cities and Climate Action Lab is hosting three live workshops at COP28, which invite young people and policy-makers to co-design an agenda for improving cities to be healthier and more sustainable.

Viewpoint: IARC s aspartame report echoes globally-rejected glyphosate cancer determination — Controversial organization ignores back-off directive from WHO, US and Japan, releasing what scientists call an illegitimate analysis

Food additives like artificial sweeteners are relentlessly tested by health authorities, researchers, independent labs and activist scientists (while we rarely examine natural food products for the same health risks). After three decades of intense scrutiny, aspartame has continuously been declared as safe for human consumption by all national regulatory agencies and EFSA.As it is a chemical used by large corporations in the food industry, it has attracted the unending ire of activist zealots who have (rather unreasonably) devoted their lives to spreading fear and disinformation on aspartame. Now, with the Ramazzini cabal working with NGOs, some media-savvy activist scientists and US tort law firms, they managed to take control of the ball with an International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) monograph on aspartame. After three decades, their time is now.Only one little problem… The IARC Monograph 134 on aspartame is illegitimate.

Viewpoint: How tort lawyers came to fund environmental activist fundamentalist attacks on science and agriculture

Since the period of stakeholder dialogue in the 1990s and early 2000s, environmental activists engaged in the policy process to try to make an impact. And this worked for the easy wins (increased recycling, lower emissions and effluents, incentives for energy-saving devices, better water and air quality…) but enough was just never enough. The green ambition expanded towards banning synthetic chemicals, plastics, pesticides, fossil fuels, fertilisers, nuclear energy and GMOs, to name a few. This demanded more than just a handful of busy lobbyists and an umbrella group of NGOs. Lately their ambition has extended even further to, well, cancelling out capitalism, corporations and industry. As experience with the war on tobacco showed, regulations would only go so far, especially if you are battling against a product or activity the public want and expect. To defeat industry (ie, to save the world), NGOs would need to wage war on multiple fronts.If industry actors think this is still only

© 2024 Vimarsana

vimarsana © 2020. All Rights Reserved.