bill: you were. i have to give props. 6 to 3 supreme court did the right thing. note the three justices that would allow to you lose your life for some principle of freedom of speech. it s just nuts. now we go to this police chief. explain this to me, guilfoyle. this is a follow-up. this guy sued his own department because he was using a department telephone, right? pager. bill: pager to text his mistress while he was working and he thought it was infringement. they checked up on him. in 2008, the ninth circuit said no, no, no, no, police department, you can t do that. bill: where was this, again? this was in ontario, california. bill: outside of l.a. supreme court takes it up 9-0. everybody agrees and says incorrect. bill: even ruth bader ginsburg. they were all kinging together consume kum ba yah. if you use a device given to you by your corporation. right. bill: is this public or private. the decision just effects public employees.
Detailed text transcripts for TV channel - FOXNEWS - 20160709:08:52:30
comparemela.com - get the latest breaking news, showbiz & celebrity photos, sport news & rumours, viral videos and top stories from comparemela.com Daily Mail and Mail on Sunday newspapers.
Detailed text transcripts for TV channel - FOXNEWS - 20160708:22:52:30
comparemela.com - get the latest breaking news, showbiz & celebrity photos, sport news & rumours, viral videos and top stories from comparemela.com Daily Mail and Mail on Sunday newspapers.
what the president is attempting to do here is ingratiot himself to the international community by saying the united states is giving up further responsibilities. the united states is receding more from the international stage and turning this over to an international body as yet undetermined. really unclear how it s going to operate but with a lot of bad actors playing in it. i think this is an ill considered move on the part of the administration. much as they did with the so-called re-set with russia. if we play nice and say nice things and we tell you that we want you to act good and we will act good and everybody can hold hands and sing consume by kum ba yah: they took it as a sign of weakness. others on the international scene will take this as a much smaller way as a sign weakness as well. is there any foreign involvement in the creation of this company to begin with or the internet? is this just all ours so that any sort of turning it over is really a surrender