bill: you were. i have to give props. 6 to 3 supreme court did the right thing. note the three justices that would allow to you lose your life for some principle of freedom of speech. it s just nuts. now we go to this police chief. explain this to me, guilfoyle. this is a follow-up. this guy sued his own department because he was using a department telephone, right? pager. bill: pager to text his mistress while he was working and he thought it was infringement. they checked up on him. in 2008, the ninth circuit said no, no, no, no, police department, you can t do that. bill: where was this, again? this was in ontario, california. bill: outside of l.a. supreme court takes it up 9-0. everybody agrees and says incorrect. bill: even ruth bader ginsburg. they were all kinging together consume kum ba yah. if you use a device given to you by your corporation. right. bill: is this public or private. the decision just effects public employees.
i have to give props. 6 to 3 supreme court did the right thing. note the three justices that would allow to you lose your life for some principle of freedom of speech. it s just nuts. now we go to this police chief. explain this to me, guilfoyle. this is a follow-up. this guy sued his own department because he was using a department telephone, right? pager. bill: pager to text his mistress while he was working and he thought it was infringement. they checked up on him. in 2008, the ninth circuit said no, no, no, no, police department, you can t do that. bill: where was this, again? this was in ontario, california. bill: outside of l.a. supreme court takes it up 9-0. everybody agrees and says incorrect. bill: even ruth bader ginsburg. they were all kinging together consume kum ba yah. if you use a device given to you by your corporation. right. bill: is this public or private. the decision just effects public employees.
bill: you were. i have to give props. 6 to 3 supreme court did the right thing. note the three justices that would allow to you lose your life for some principle of freedom of speech. it s just nuts. now we go to this police chief. explain this to me, guilfoyle. this is a follow-up. this guy sued his own department because he was using a department telephone, right? pager. bill: pager to text his mistress while he was working and he thought it was infringement. they checked up on him. in 2008, the ninth circuit said no, no, no, no, police department, you can t do that. bill: where was this, again? this was in ontario, california. bill: outside of l.a. supreme court takes it up 9-0. everybody agrees and says incorrect. bill: even ruth bader ginsburg. they were all kinging together consume kum ba yah. if you use a device given to you by your corporation. right. bill: is this public or private. the decision just effects public employees.