were involved in the murder. prior to the investigation, prior to everything, really, your intuition or your detective knowledge led you to amanda knox and raffaele sollecito. translator: after the first few weeks, we were convinced because of the behavior of the two people and especially amanda that they were both involved in the crime. but almost immediately after the arrests, benigni had a problem, that third suspect lamumba had an air-tight alibi. he was in his crowded bar that night and could not have been involved. then the actual forensic tests came back. when i looked at it, i was horrified. greg hampikian is a forensic biologist at boise state university and director of idaho s innocent project. he s also working with the knox
night. he could not have been involved. then the actual forensic tests came back. when i looked at it, i was horrified. greg hampikian is a forensic biologist at boise state university, and director of idaho s innocence project. he also was working with the knox defense team. he says italian investigators did a good job processing the crime scene, collected excellent evidence, but clung to shakier evidence that proved their theory, a classic error, he says, a prosecutor who trusted his gut feeling instead of the science that at that time was pointing to another suspect. they didn t like the way amanda behaved, whatever that
university and director of idaho s innocence project. he also was working with the knox defense team. he says italian investigators did a good job processing the crime scene, collected excellent evidence, but clung to shakier evidence that proved their theory, a classic error, he says, a prosecutor who trusted his gut feeling instead of the science that at that time was pointing to another suspect. they didn t like the way amanda behaved, whatever that means, and so they wanted to investigate her and raffaello and her boss. when the dna is finally processed, it s not any of their suspects. so what do you do? what would you do? you let them go. as patrick lumumba was being released from jail, investigators analyzing the bloody evidence left at the
university and director of idaho s innocence project. he also was working with the knox defense team. he says italian investigators did a good job processing the crime scene, collected excellent evidence, but clung to shakier evidence that proved their theory, a classic error, he says, a prosecutor who trusted his gut feeling instead of the science that at that time was pointing to another suspect. they didn t like the way amanda behaved, whatever that means, and so they wanted to investigate her and raffaello and her boss. when the dna is finally processed, it s not any of their suspects. so what do you do? what would you do? you let them go. as patrick lumumba was being released from jail, investigators analyzing the bloody evidence left at the crime scene found an entirely new suspect. his name? rudy guede, a known petty criminal from the ivory coast
biologist at boise state university and director of the idaho s innocence project and also working with the knox defense team. he says italian investigators did a good job processing the crime scene, collected excellent evidence, but clung to shakier evidence that proved their theory, a classic error, he says, a prosecutor who trusted his gut feeling instead of the science that at that time was pointing to another suspect. they didn t like the way amanda behaved, whatever that means, and so they wanted to investigate her and raffaele and her boss. when the dna is finally processed, it s not any of their suspects. so what do you do? what would you do? you let them go. as patrick lumumba was being released from jail, investigators analyzing the