were involved in the murder. prior to the investigation, prior to everything, really, your intuition or your detective knowledge led you to amanda knox and raffaele sollecito. translator: after the first few weeks, we were convinced because of the behavior of the two people and especially amanda that they were both involved in the crime. but almost immediately after the arrests, benigni had a problem, that third suspect lamumba had an air-tight alibi. he was in his crowded bar that night and could not have been involved. then the actual forensic tests came back. when i looked at it, i was horrified. greg hampikian is a forensic biologist at boise state university and director of idaho s innocent project. he s also working with the knox
the police announcing to the public, case solved. giuliano mignini admitted to us, even without any evidence, he knew almost the moment he arrived and laid eyes on amanda knox and raffaele sollecito they were involved in the murder. prior to the forensic investigation, prior to everything really, your intuition or your detective knowledge led you to amanda knox and raffaele sollecito? translator: after the first few weeks we were convinced because of the behavior of the two people and especially amanda that they were both involved in a crime. but almost immediately after the arrests, mignini had a problem. the third suspect patrick lumumba had an airtight alibi. he was in his crowded bar that
take a lock. prior to the forensic investigation and everything really, your intuition or detective knowledge led you to amanda knox rafael? translator: after the first few weeks, we were convinced because of the behavior of the two people and especially amanda that they were both involved in the crime. you were fixated according to the defense on amanda knox and rafael and kept imagining new scenarios that made these two people guilty. translator: no. absolutely not. i did what i did because i was convinced given the evidence that had been gathered that they were responsible. i am absolutely convinced. so drew i hope you can hear and i know it s loud here, but give us more context.
intuition or your detective knowledge led you to amanda knox and raphael? translator: after the first few weeks, we were convinced because of the behavior of the two people and especially amanda, that they were both involved in the crime. reporter: but almost immediately after the arrests, menini had a problem. the third suspect, patrick, had an airtight alibi. he was in his crowded bar that night. he could not have been involved. then the actual forensic tests came back. when i looked at it, i was horrified. reporter: a forensic biologist at boise state university and director of idaho s innocence project. he says italian investigators did a good job processing the crime scene, collected excellent evidence. but clung to shakier evidence
investigation, prior to everything really, your intuition or your detective knowledge led you to amanda knox and raphael? translator: after the first few weeks, we were convinced because of the behavior of the two people and especially amanda, that they were both involved in the crime. reporter: but almost immediately after the arrests, menini had a problem. the third suspect, patrick, had an airtight alibi. he was in his crowded bar that night. he could not have been involved. then the actual forensic tests came back. when i looked at it, i was horrified. reporter: a forensic biologist at boise state university and director of idaho s innocence project. he says italian investigators