complete holy hell, remember? this is going to be the misdemeanor from hell for merrick garland, joe biden, and nancy pelosi. they took on the wrong guy this time. well, that s what makes the one-time trump white house advisers move now, well, extra confounding because eight months ago, bannon said that he wasn t backing down ever. i mean, the wrong guy this time, right? well, trial dates have a funny way of making people change their minds, shall we say, because now he is, well, backing down. willing to testify before that very committee that he seemed to be mocking and taunting. now, what exactly changed other than maybe the calendar date? we re going to dig a lot deeper into all of that tonight along with new january 6th hearing developments. and if bannon thought his decision to testify now would call someone s bluff at the doj, well he s surely mistaken because a trial is still happening and it won t even be postponed. a federal judge denied his legal team s request
didn t set up in the last segment. people are nasa excited and people when you build the first images from the times of space telescope. those are likely some of the first galaxies form in the universe booms of years ago. when you see, by the way, from a spike of sky. as small as a grain of said held at arms length. my mind is exploding. and the blurring and stretching you see in from the galleries, that is actually their light being spent by all the massive galaxies between them and us. gravitational lunging, key prediction of hindsight theory of general relativity. something to make even einstein smile. and have to do more research do that in. then use continues with laura coats and cnn tonight. we re talking behind. thank you already above. me thanks anderson. i appreciated. i know e=mc2. that s ball can get through today. but i am laura coats, this is cnn tonight. so steve bannon, he threw down the conflict after being indicted on criminal contempt charges back in nov
Do you think there's no good protest music these days? So did I, until I started looking for it. The truth is, it’s always been out there, but it's sometimes just a bit difficult to find. Every month, I search it out, listen to it all, then round up the best of it that relates to that month’s political news. Here’s the round-up for April 2023. manif-hits.jpg 1. VARIOUS
electorate, those the committee is wanting to persuade what happened. does it make a difference who is the speaker? it s kind of the opposite of killing the messenger. it s putting them in the front row. i think it does make a difference, and i think we re seeing some of the softening of the support for trump in the wake of this investigation that there is a mentally developing among republicans, among trump supporters, that this was really a very bad situation on january 6th, that people are not telling the truth about it on trump s side, and that upstanding republicans are coming forward and blowing the whistle. and that s been the clear, consistent message of these hearings. but it does have to be said that there has not been the kind of back and forth, the kind of cross-examination, the kind of hostile witnesses that we generally see in congressional investigations of this sort. and if the public harkens back to not just the watergate
a difference to the audience? the consuming electorate? those home some of the committee wants to persuade, at least understand what happened. does make a difference who is the actual speaker? i mean, it is kind of the opposite, killing the messenger. it s kind of putting them in the front row i think it does make a difference, i think we are seeing some of the softening of the support for trump in the wake of this investigation. that there is a mentality, a developing among republicans. among trump supporters. that this was really very bad situation on january 6th that people are not telling the truth about it. on trump side. and that upstanding republicans are coming forward and blowing the whistle. that has been the clear consistent message of these hearings. but it does have to be said that there has not been the kind of back and forth, the kind of cross-examination, the kind of hostile witnesses that we generally see questionable