now it is the next presidential campaign and now it is the son of ron who jesse benton has been working for. not ron paul himself. this is sort of a bombshell indictment. jesse benton has been questioned about this. he is being charged with five counts which include making false counts and conspiracy. the president of the eagle eating fish rand paul super pac, this guy john tait, is facing four counts. another one is trying to cover up the whole scheme. jesse benton shared the stage with rand paul four months ago. as he ron all that/rand paul lifer and he is now staring down the barrel of a five-count federal indictment. they are schedule to appear in court. jesse benton said through a lawyer that he is eager to go before a judge. he said it is a politically motivated investigation. this is a big deal. it was a big development last
campaign and its staffers were still apparently paying the state senator. according to the indictment this is the last payment for kent sorensen. the deal jesse there agreed to with kent. now it is the next presidential campaign and now it is the son of ron who jesse benton has been working for. not ron paul himself. this is sort of a bombshell indictment. jesse benton has been questioned about this. he is being charged with five counts which include making false counts and conspiracy. the president of the eagle eating fish rand paul super pac, this guy john tait is facing four counts. another one is trying to cover up the whole scheme. jesse benton shared the stage with rand paul four months ago. as he ron all that/rand paul lifer and he is now staring down
operative. take it with a grain of salt. bret: charles it s true that there are not a lot of checks in the process on the online especially. doing it with a wink and nod and pretending they have safeguards. they want to be plausibly denial. they is know there is foreign money coming in, but if anything happens it s not until after the election day so why should they care? bret: winners and loserring. hugo chavez. bret: hugo chavez? he ron re-election. the only person who recall him in an election will be god. loser is, hay it to say this with the minority with martha raddatz, i see good money to see the fight not the referee. bret: interventionist moderator. you said itism put a name on it now. stuck with that. mitt romney is the winner. there was a good analysis. this was not a bump but change
cushion. a former fbi assistant director with us. ron, goes back and forth between the cia and the fbi on their respective intelligence takes on this. who are we to trust or count on for reliable suspicions? that s a great question, neil. i think that they could be we could be in a situation where the different agencies are relying on different intelligence to form the basis of their individual opinion. that could be the cia has deeper access to sources and methods that are their own, that they re protecting from others, and they should. and then drawing their conclusions on sources and methods that the fbi dot nat does not have immediate access to, or the fbi is more cautious. no doubt in counter, when we talk about a beyond a reasonable