Point we need your help. Is there any additional Public Comment . Seeing none, Public Comment is closed. Commissioners that will place you under your regular calendar item 12. Item 12 2013. 1648c k. Burns; 4155 57591122 1945 hyde street between russell and union streets; lot 002 in assessors block 0123 request for conditional use authorization, pursuant to planning code sections 303, 710. 44 and 790. 91 to establish a restaurant d. B. A. Union larderr which will operate as a bona fide eating place in a vacant commercial space. The property is located within a neighborhood commercial cluster district, and 40x height and bulk district. This action constitutes the approval action for the project for the purposes of ceqa, pursuant to section 31. 044hh of the San Francisco calendar item 12. Sf 121234 good afternoon president wu and members of the commission. Planning department staff. The item before you is a request for conditional use authorization to establish a restaurant doing business
The building for 2 years. My grandmother is already affected by the property. Moratoriums have real finance consequences for people and can be devastated. We have requested to have our Liquor License approved before the moratorium is passed. At this point we need your help. Is there any additional Public Comment . Seeing none, Public Comment is closed. Commissioners that will place you under your regular calendar item 12. Item 12 2013. 1648c k. Burns; 4155 57591122 1945 hyde street between russell and union streets; lot 002 in assessors block 0123 request for conditional use authorization, pursuant to planning code sections 303, 710. 44 and 790. 91 to establish a restaurant d. B. A. Union larderr which will operate as a bona fide eating place in a vacant commercial space. The property is located within a neighborhood commercial cluster district, and 40x height and bulk district. This action constitutes the approval action for the project for the purposes of ceqa, pursuant to section 31
Can be devastated. We have requested to have our Liquor License approved before the moratorium is passed. At this point we need your help. Is there any additional Public Comment . Seeing none, Public Comment is closed. Commissioners that will place you under your regular calendar item 12. Item 12 2013. 1648c k. Burns; 4155 57591122 1945 hyde street between russell and union streets; lot 002 in assessors block 0123 request for conditional use authorization, pursuant to planning code sections 303, 710. 44 and 790. 91 to establish a restaurant d. B. A. Union larderr which will operate as a bona fide eating place in a vacant commercial space. The property is located within a neighborhood commercial cluster district, and 40x height and bulk district. This action constitutes the approval action for the project for the purposes of ceqa, pursuant to section 31. 044hh of the San Francisco calendar item 12. Sf 121234 good afternoon president wu and members of the commission. Planning department
My name is thomas. I live at 2200 colcan street. Im in strong opposition to the boxes and the dpw process. Our objection is where they would like to place this dece. I would also like to speak from the architect in having practice, im very familiar with code language. Dpw ordered 11566 which is a very complicated regulation which i have concluded with my study has been very hastily written. In my effort to write this problem we had this meeting in november. At this meeting, mr. Julian chang said that at t sees this problem as a threelegged stool. It is my understanding right now that at t has rescinded this pledge. This is a grave unfortunate event. I have assembled a group of local distinguished Design Professionals who have designed underground volts for electrical high voltage systems and Telecommunications Equipment with basements below sea level. If these facilities construct these with public right of way can meet this challenge like pg e has, so can at t. On the screen is our ph
You very much. Next speaker. Hi. My name is karen chang and i live in the sunset. This is a model for private property, here we are talking about our streets used by residents and distances much greater. Residents and 300 feet is not a notification by employing this rule, notification to the public is under cut and opposition will be less. Weve also talked about the process around proposing alternative sites that meet the criteria. This is an insidious way of letting neighbors choose the locations for the sf. This is not only a repugnant consequence of regulation but a waste of time. The fact is that no one wants this in front of their house. The service they claim they did did not ask people if they would accept a box in fronted of their house to get that service. If the community does not offer and alternative site. This process is unacceptable and chooses which neighbor to punish with sf m. Requiring this is a conflict. Weve also talked about the community opposition. I would like t