Reporter Wayne Freedman who is live in San Francisco. Good afternoon ama. Just moments ago they were here at Civic Center Plaza. They are now marching in San Francisco. Lets show you what it looked like here a short time ago. They were loud. They were purposeful. Is may day a holiday . In San Francisco and within the immigrant community its a holiday. Hence the festivities in the civic plaza today, many of these people immigrant workers. All of them were celebrating a raise in San Franciscos minimum wage 11 . 05 to 15. Its a step in the right direction. Tell that to anyone working for minimum wage in this city that sees Everything Else going up including rents. Very hard. I have i used to have two jobs and my husband also has two jobs. And Jessica Garcia has a small child as well. She makes salad on bush street in San Francisco. A Small Business that is hiring though on the other side of this issue, owner julian chang says hed love to hire even more people. Hes an immigrant from france
My name is thomas. I live at 2200 colcan street. Im in strong opposition to the boxes and the dpw process. Our objection is where they would like to place this dece. I would also like to speak from the architect in having practice, im very familiar with code language. Dpw ordered 11566 which is a very complicated regulation which i have concluded with my study has been very hastily written. In my effort to write this problem we had this meeting in november. At this meeting, mr. Julian chang said that at t sees this problem as a threelegged stool. It is my understanding right now that at t has rescinded this pledge. This is a grave unfortunate event. I have assembled a group of local distinguished Design Professionals who have designed underground volts for electrical high voltage systems and Telecommunications Equipment with basements below sea level. If these facilities construct these with public right of way can meet this challenge like pg e has, so can at t. On the screen is our ph
You very much. Next speaker. Hi. My name is karen chang and i live in the sunset. This is a model for private property, here we are talking about our streets used by residents and distances much greater. Residents and 300 feet is not a notification by employing this rule, notification to the public is under cut and opposition will be less. Weve also talked about the process around proposing alternative sites that meet the criteria. This is an insidious way of letting neighbors choose the locations for the sf. This is not only a repugnant consequence of regulation but a waste of time. The fact is that no one wants this in front of their house. The service they claim they did did not ask people if they would accept a box in fronted of their house to get that service. If the community does not offer and alternative site. This process is unacceptable and chooses which neighbor to punish with sf m. Requiring this is a conflict. Weve also talked about the community opposition. I would like t
Process would work. It should be advertised if its an agreement. Supervisor scott weiner yeah. Mou. Memorandum of understanding. Also the dpw stuff today is not available. The regulations for some reasons supervisor scott weiner okay. Talk to dpw. Well make sure its available. Next speaker. Chairman wieners, supervisors, my name is brand anderson in a Community Organization but here as an individual. Our supervisor farrell made the same comments as you that if you dont want them they are not going to be there. We made calls about 311 and 1800. I think dpw who is in charge of this she should have provided you spreadsheets that said we get 150 calls or 311, here are the dates and locations. I dont know if thats occurred. In the same breath i think at t should be talking to dpw to say we got a call, here is what we did and where we did it and talk about that to communicate. Dpw has a long way to go to figure out how to run this process. It appears flawed to me. I would also find a way to
Practice, im very familiar with code language. Dpw ordered 11566 which is a very complicated regulation which i have concluded with my study has been very hastily written. In my effort to write this problem we had this meeting in november. At this meeting, mr. Julian chang said that at t sees this problem as a threelegged stool. It is my understanding right now that at t has rescinded this pledge. This is a grave unfortunate event. I have assembled a group of local distinguished Design Professionals who have designed underground volts for electrical high voltage systems and Telecommunications Equipment with basements below sea level. If these facilities construct these with public right of way can meet this challenge like pg e has, so can at t. On the screen is our photographs of how pg e has better understood the needs of San Francisco. We would like to know if the city is holding at t to a lesser standard compared to pg e. On august 20th of this year in a Public Meeting with the coal