The Opposition has blamed the ruling dispensation for unleashing political instability in many states of the country, saying elected governments are being overthrown due to horse-trading. As the political crisis brews, parties look up at the Supreme Court to neutralise an attempt to topple elected governments. Here's how the apex court ruled in past cases of alleged
The Opposition has blamed the ruling dispensation for unleashing political instability in many states of the country, saying elected governments are being overthrown due to horse-trading. As the political crisis brews, parties look up at the .
The Modi government has already insisted on having a say in judicial appointments. If the Parliament passes a refurbished law spelling out how judges will be appointed, it will override the apex court verdict quashing the NJAC.
The Supreme Court on Friday continued its hearing on the COVID situation and said any clampdown on information will be treated as contempt. The apex court
Updated:
April 29, 2021 19:21 IST
“You are not even aware of the stage of probe. How can a Article 32 petition be entertained here?” Justice Lalit asked advocate Siddharth Dave
Share Article
AAA
A file photo of former Arunachal Pradesh Chief Minister Kalikho Pul. | Photo Credit: Ritu Raj Konwar
“You are not even aware of the stage of probe. How can a Article 32 petition be entertained here?” Justice Lalit asked advocate Siddharth Dave
The Supreme Court on Thursday refused an NGO’s plea to order a CBI probe into the death of Kalikho Pul, former Chief Minister of Arunachal Pradesh, in August 2016.
A Bench led by Justice U.U. Lalit asked Social Vigilance Team, represented by senior advocate Siddharth Dave, about its locus standi to file a writ petition.