comparemela.com

Latest Breaking News On - Kagan justice - Page 14 : comparemela.com

Transcripts For CSPAN2 Key Capitol Hill Hearings 20240622

Spec. I think theyre very capable to get the job done. I dont think any of us know about korea i dont know where they are to develop a nuclear weapon. I dont know exactly what their intentions are with the Ballistic Missile strike capabilities but we know where they are moving toward we have to be prepared for that eventuality as well. Dave mitchell leaving great detail all the preparations is something to Pay Attention to every day. Do they have the missile capable to reach the u. S. Right now . I am saying this from newspaper articles. But whether they have capability certainly want to reach hawaii. That is what we are worried about. Of a joint force command in the event of the apparent attack could you give us some idea . The discussion i would not call it a debate as discussion involves the secretary of the error force the commander of u. S. Strategic command the the voices with policy experts from National Security experts. As we try to help commandandcontrol architecture with a g

Transcripts For CSPAN Conversation With Justice Elena Kagan 20170903

On july 7, 1981, i was driving in my car where i was a relatively recent partner at my law firm. Our lawyers and our spouses had returned from a firm outing to prescott, arizona, which has the oldest rodeo on the fourth of july. Of course aware of the rumors that then judge oconnor was being considered for the Supreme Court, we asked her some questions. As you would expect, she was dismissive of the rumors and quickly turned in a conversation to another topic. As i drove that morning, i turned on the news. Just in time to hear president reagan say, she is truly a person for all seasons. I had missed the first part of his remarks and i had not heard him say who she was. During the rest of his remarks, he did not repeat the name. Only when i of course was pounding my Steering Wheel asking, who is it . Only when a reporter began speaking, i knew she was Sandra Day Oconnor. I reacted the way many women lawyers reacted, with great emotion. We hoped the world for women and law had changed th

Transcripts For CSPAN Conversation With Justice Elena Kagan 20170903

Oconnor. This Aspen Institute event is just over an hour. Good evening and thank you merrill. On july 7, 1981, i was driving in my car where i was a relatively recent partner at my law firm. Our lawyers and our spouses had returned from a firm outing to prescott, arizona, which has the oldest rodeo on the fourth of july. Of course aware of the rumors that then judge oconnor was being considered for the Supreme Court, we asked her some questions. As you would expect, she was dismissive of the rumors and quickly turned in a conversation to another topic. As i drove that morning, i turned on the news. Just in time to hear president reagan say, she is truly a person for all seasons. N a convn to another topic. As i drove that morning, i turned on the news. Just in time to hear president reagan say, she is truly a person for all seasons. I had missed the first part of his remarks and i had not heard him say who she was. During the rest of his remarks, he did not repeat the name. Only when i

Transcripts For CSPAN Gill V Whitford Oral Argument 20171009

On a threshold matter, this court should hold the courts jurisdiction to entertain statewide political gerrymandering challenges, leaving district specific gerrymandering. I think it is true there is no case that directly helps respondents strongly on the standing issue. You have a strong argument. Suppose the court you have to assume we will know exactly the parameters of it decided this was a First Amendment issue. Not an equal protection issue. With that change the calculus so if you are in one part of the state you have a First Amendment interest in having your party strong or the other party weak . It is still grounded in the right to vote. Folks only vote on their own district. They have more members and congress for example, like a Wisconsin Republican might want more Texas Republicans in congress. But no one would say that you have a First Amendment or first fourteenth amendment right in that sort of circumstance to challenge texas law that you would, for example, argue led to

Transcripts For CSPAN Murr V Wisconsin Oral Argument 20170624

Justice suppose three years from now, the lots, more valuable than that two lot singly. Each lot would be worth 100,000, that these bigger lots are worth 500,000. The county wants a fire station and it takes a lot e. What do they pay for it . They should pay compensation for the taking of lot e. Justice kennedy under your hypothetical, owners would stand to lose 300,000, and your answer . I do not think so. Justice kennedy singly they are worth 100,000 each. What is the amount the county has to pay to take lot e . The analysis must begin Justice Kennedy and in your view that is lot e only. They pay 100,000, that is it. The land owner would have the burden of proving there are additional damages they should be compensated for Justice Kennedy there are no severance damages. Youre taking the entire parcel. They should be paid compensation for lot e Justice Kennedy in your syrian in your theory, land owners would lose money and the state would be getting the windfall. If that hypothetical

© 2025 Vimarsana

vimarsana © 2020. All Rights Reserved.