time than prior nominees have had in recent memory. to say that this is about a document and about search terms and that s what the dispute is about is just wrong. this is about documents that are over 15 years old. the kagan hearings, which i had a pretty big role in watching, those documents were all turned over. all of her white house documents, all of her e-mails, everything. here 100,000 pages have been assertion of executive privilege over them and many others not produced. jameel, 30 seconds for the last word. when you troubled by the 35 months of his life and career missing in terms of a paper trail? not at all. we ve seen 12 years of his most recent years on the bench, 300 opinions, thousands and thousands of pages. we know what kind of a judge he ll be. that is what he should be judged on, not 20-years ago papers from the bush white house. waiting for us to come to you, we were hostage to the break schedule in the senate committee room. we appreciate having you on ver
Detailed text transcripts for TV channel - CNN - 20100628:18:00:15
comparemela.com - get the latest breaking news, showbiz & celebrity photos, sport news & rumours, viral videos and top stories from comparemela.com Daily Mail and Mail on Sunday newspapers.
of a nominee s judicial philosophy. i want to clarify as best i can what kind of judges what kind of a justice general kagan would be. to do that, i have to examine her entire record. as in previous hearings, there will no doubt be some tension during this hearing between what senators want to know and what general kagan is willing to tell us. unlike previous hearings, however, miss kagan has already outlined quite clearly what she believes a supreme court nomination would be willing to be talk about at a hearing like this. without this information, miss kagan has written the senate, quote, becomes incapable of either properly evaluating nominees or appropriately educating the public, end quote. miss kagan identified the political inquire re as vote, the votes she would cast, the perspective she would, and the directive she would move the institution. but the bottom line must concern the kinds of judicial decisions
keep in mind, the goal you have the main problem here, the original well. you have the two relief wells they re building on either side. they say they are on track for august or maybe ahead. one is 17,000 feet and one at 12,000 feet and there is more to go. once they get in there, there s a lot of stuff they have to do to make it come over. let s look at this. his is pretty cool imagery here at cnn.com. it started in april and you can continue to see it grow as it aflikts this region. even with the recovery efforts, it is reaching a large mass. the skimmers need to be out there doing work as soon as they can. josh, if yufb s been away and enjoyed the weekend and yesterday was dominated by the kagan hearings, that s a good reset on where we are.
petraeus, just a short while ago the senate armed services committee approved his nomination and sent it to the full senate. some of the toughest questions for the general focused on whether the administration is set on withdrawing troops from afghanistan next summer. general, at any time during the deliberations that the military shared with the president when he went through the decision-making process, was there a recommendation from you or anyone in the military that we set a date of july 2011? there was not. by any military person that you know of? not that i m aware of. we re going to talk more about the petraeus and kagan hearings ahead with the best political team on television. i want to go to the gulf coast right now. vice president joe biden is close to wrapping up the day-long tour of the oil disaster zone. he visits the naval air station in pensacola, florida, at this hour. our senior correspondent allan
vimarsana © 2020. All Rights Reserved.