During the ongoing hearings challenging the revocation of Jammu and Kashmir's Article 370, senior advocate Gopal Subramanium argued that Article 370 facilitated communication between India's Constitution and Jammu and Kashmir's Constitution. Subramanium presented arguments about the roles of constituent assemblies, legality of Presidential Orders, and the bilateral nature of Article 370. He emphasised the need to respect both constitutions and questioned the legality of unilateral powers exercised. He also discussed the unique historical context of Jammu and Kashmir, its autonomous status, and the mutual agreements that Article 370 represented. The court deliberated on the absence of 'Constitution of Jammu and Kashmir'in Article 370.
Chief Justice DY Chandrachud recently made an oral remark on the constitution of a 7 judge bench for considering the money bill issue. Its formation is due to the reference made by the constitution.
Delhi Govt has control over services except for public order, police and land: SC on Delhi-Centre power row dailyexcelsior.com - get the latest breaking news, showbiz & celebrity photos, sport news & rumours, viral videos and top stories from dailyexcelsior.com Daily Mail and Mail on Sunday newspapers.
The matter, comprising various issues, has wound its way up from the Delhi High Court, which ruled on it in 2017. There are many twists and turns in the story, and judgments by multiple Benches. The SC verdict will be crucial, with far-reaching impac
The verdict will have far-reaching implications for how Delhi is going to be governed not just by AAP or the L-G but also for parties elected to the state legislature in future. The issue of split in power between the elected government and Delhi L-G was first decided by SC in 2018.