During the ongoing hearings challenging the revocation of Jammu and Kashmir's Article 370, senior advocate Gopal Subramanium argued that Article 370 facilitated communication between India's Constitution and Jammu and Kashmir's Constitution. Subramanium presented arguments about the roles of constituent assemblies, legality of Presidential Orders, and the bilateral nature of Article 370. He emphasised the need to respect both constitutions and questioned the legality of unilateral powers exercised. He also discussed the unique historical context of Jammu and Kashmir, its autonomous status, and the mutual agreements that Article 370 represented. The court deliberated on the absence of 'Constitution of Jammu and Kashmir'in Article 370.