Senior counsel Yusuf Muchhala for the petitioners drew the attention of the Court towards an alleged campaign to change the names of cities with Muslim names without following laid down procedures.
Nominal Index [Citation 186 - 196]VJ Jindal Cocoa Pvt Lt v. Union of India & Ors. 2023 LiveLaw (Bom) 186Ramnagesh Srinivas Akubathini v. State of Maharashtra and Anr. 2023 LiveLaw (Bom) 187Ashok.
The court was informed that the College of Engineering, Pune (COEP), had conducted a structural audit and the structures were declared safe, and therefore the PIL had no merit.
Nominal Index [Citation 126 – 175]Shoyab Mehtab Ali v. Divisional Commissioner and Anr. 2023 LiveLaw (Bom) 126Lok Developers vs Deputy Commissioner of Income tax - 2023 LiveLaw (Bom) 127Rakesh.
The PIL said 1,700 buses of Maharashtra Road Transport Corporation (MSRTC) were pressed into service by the state to ferry people for the event, and over Rs 10 crore was paid by Shinde to MSRTC for the said service, apart from those who provided more facilities at the rally.